Sooooo........anyone weigh the new sleds yet?

trench

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
953
Reaction score
731
Location
Sturgeon County, Alberta
i found this on snow west, i know these are not all 2013 weights but i bet its not that much different.

these weights are everything full of fluids, oil, antifreeze...everything, except all fuel tanks are drained and completely empty

2013 PRO 155" 438 lbs
2012 PRO 155" 454 lbs
2012 M8 153" 496 lbs
2012 ETEC 800 154" 501 lbs


No one (except Polaris riders) believes those numbers!! Lol
 

Toyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2008
Messages
944
Reaction score
1,258
Location
someplace
I once knew a few girls, some were skinny, some were a little thicker, some were...well...anyways.

I didn't always pick the skinny ones to romp around with because they were skinny, sometimes the thicker girls just out performed the skinny ones :)

It only feels that way cause there is more impact on their landings
 

Kiwionsnow

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
190
Reaction score
237
Location
Kamloops
Yes, the XM has been there for 2 days and I can't deny the pro has some nice clean body/chasis lines. the XM is growing on me but slowly..
 

trench

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
953
Reaction score
731
Location
Sturgeon County, Alberta
Wondered when you would show up, I have already acknowledged that the Austrian built motor is more powerful and newer better technology. I would rather drive a six cylinder Corvette, than an eight cylinder Impala lol.
 
Last edited:

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
109,796
Reaction score
108,504
Location
Milo,Alberta
Wondered when you would show up, I have already acknowledged that the Austrian built motor is more powerful and newer better technology.
Started smelling smelly and followed my nose. Lol.
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
All weights posted need a picture of the number on a scale or no one will believe it just saying
 
Last edited:

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
2013 Ski-Doo Summit SP 800 154
Engine: 800R E-TEC 2-stroke HP: 163.9* Exhaust: Single tuned pipe, rear entry, baffle muffler Drive: TRA VII / QRS Ski Stance: 35.7-37.4 in. adj. Front Susp.: Dual A-arm w/ HPG shocks (8-in. travel) Rear Susp.: tMotion w/ HPG shocks (15-in. travel) Track: 16x154x2.25 Powder Max 1-ply Fuel Tank: 10.6 gal. Rec. Fuel: 91 octane Dry Weight: 464 lbs. Price: $11,899 US / $12,999 CA *AmSnow tested
tested 2012




2013 Polaris 800 Pro-RMK 155
Engine: 795cc Liberty 2-stroke HP: 143.2* Exhaust: SC VES, Single Drive: P-85 / TEAM LWT Ski Stance: 39-40-41 in. adj. Front Susp.: Pro-Ride RMK adj. w/ Walker Evans shocks (9-in. travel) Rear Susp.: RMK coil-over w/ Walker Evans shocks (16-in. travel) Track: 15x155x2.4 Series 5.1 Fuel Tank: 11.5 gal. Rec. Fuel: 91 octane Dry Weight: 417 lbs. Wet Weight: 577 lbs.* Price: $12,199 US / $13,499 CA *AmSnow tested 2012






2013 Arctic Cat M 800 SP 153
Engine: 794cc 2-stroke HP: 163.4* Exhaust: APV w/tuned pipe, pipe sensor, stainless steel muffler Drive: Arctic 6 post / 10.75-in. dia. Ski Stance: 38-39 in. adj. Front Susp.: Arctic Race w/ FOX Float 2 shocks (9-in. travel) Rear Susp.: M suspension w/ Tri-hub rear axle system, FOX Zero Pro (IFP) front shock, FOX Float 2 rear shock (15-in. travel) Track: 15x153x2.6 Power Claw Fuel Tank: 10.6 gal. Rec. Fuel: 87 octane Dry Weight: N/A Wet Weight: 576 lbs.* Price: $12,349 US / $13,799 CA *AmSnow tested 2012



This info is all from American snowmobile they never had a wet weight for the doo
 
Last edited:

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
Oh and if these are accurate the yamaha nytro is only 20 to 30 pounds heavier haha thought I'd throw that in there ��
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
I know it seemed to be a lot but I think American snowmobile is a decent sled mag so you'd think they do it all right.
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,097
Reaction score
43,303
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
i just remembered something. doesnt the pro rmk have an extrememly small cooling system? ie very small rear cooler loop? hence why im always waiting for them to cool down on the trail in the spring? this can also account for 15+lbs no problem. again just one of those items that may not matter to someone.

800_rmk_155_f5.jpg

is that cooler full tunnel width or is it a small loop running down each edge?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom