Clutch Weights. What Am I Missing Here?

Radar78

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
594
Reaction score
1,373
Location
Dundurn, Sask. Canada
Brought home a new to me sled today. ‘19 AC Alpha with 59 miles. I get the feeling the guy I bought it from thought he knows a lot more then he actually does. Anywho. He claims the weights currently in the sled are low elevation weights (haven’t checked yet) and he threw in a new set of weights that he claimed were for “high elevation”. Sled calls for 72’s for 3000-6000 feet. So the weights he threw in in an unopened package are stamped 70’s, weighed in as 72’s, and packed as 74’s. What gives? I’m I missing something?

5a32750592dc4f9db638abc83b79725a.jpg

f571217a1bc7525ce1a3aee4dca1feca.jpg

5ecca5a69add0cfaadfc944dcfc05bf2.jpg
 

JMCX

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
3,863
Location
Calgary
My 19 Alpha has the factory weights and they say J14-70. I ride mainly Golden and think the clutching is great.
 

Radar78

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
594
Reaction score
1,373
Location
Dundurn, Sask. Canada
Wtf? How the hell could I have missed that? I’ll check it out tonight!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

new_nytro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
206
Reaction score
384
Location
Calgary
It would be coincidental that it worked out to be exactly 72 grams per weight.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure I follow what you are saying? 72 ml of water weighs 72 grams as 1 ml of water weighs 1 gram. I don't think it is coincidental, it just how the metric system works. 1000 ml of water = 1000 gr = 1 kg
 

Radar78

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
594
Reaction score
1,373
Location
Dundurn, Sask. Canada
Not sure I follow what you are saying? 72 ml of water weighs 72 grams as 1 ml of water weighs 1 gram. I don't think it is coincidental, it just how the metric system works. 1000 ml of water = 1000 gr = 1 kg

Sorry I worded that wrong. I’m saying you must be right because it would be too much of a coincidence for it to not be the same conversion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

97summit

Active member
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
56
Reaction score
45
Location
Gunn Ab
Yes I guess it would not make a differance if set on water or weight. Curious to see what the scale says. So on the milk setting it would be 74?
 

new_nytro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
206
Reaction score
384
Location
Calgary
Yes I guess it would not make a differance if set on water or weight. Curious to see what the scale says. So on the milk setting it would be 74?
I think he was joking. Milk is denser (same volume weighs more) than water so I think it will show lower ml number than the water setting.
 
Top Bottom