- Thread starter
- #281
Lund
Active VIP Member
Had to do it on flat land sleds as well back in the day. Stock engines not so much but it depended on the jetting.
That would be for modified engines, correct?
Had to do it on flat land sleds as well back in the day. Stock engines not so much but it depended on the jetting.
That would be for modified engines, correct?
The stock skid isn’t coupled. The QSL shock helps, but it isn’t the answer on a boosted 4S with a 3” track. I’m running a Kmod skid on mine, and under power it still carries the skis 2.5’ off the ground in position 1 when climbing. That said, I think a lot of riders love making them stand on end, simply cause it does it easily, and it’s fun to do it at will with a squeeze of the flipper.Why is it that most of these sidewinders seem to be tail walking most all of the time? Is it just for the fun factor or is that the rear suspension needs to be coupled better?
Why is it that most of these sidewinders seem to be tail walking most all of the time? Is it just for the fun factor or is that the rear suspension needs to be coupled better?
Why is it that most of these sidewinders seem to be tail walking most all of the time? Is it just for the fun factor or is that the rear suspension needs to be coupled better?
Depends on what you want your sled to handle like. One friend has a baker skid with 174 and it’s VERY planted. Too much I think but it climbs like nothing else. Other friend has a 162 with stock skid and his skis are in the air a lot. The 162 is way more fun but the 174 climbs steep better. Pick your poison.Why is it that most of these sidewinders seem to be tail walking most all of the time? Is it just for the fun factor or is that the rear suspension needs to be coupled better?