Very Quite Yesterday -9/11

[5Lgreenback]

I heard it was a comupter program developed in Canada that flew the plane into the buildings.

Ive heard lots of other conspiracy theories.
But but this one seemed some what credible.


But ya who knows.

. Some claim/ show evidence they were different planes than the flight numbers we were told. Remote controlling is certainly possible.

Who knows. Only thing that's clear is the official story is non-sense and there's boat loads of evidence pointing to insider prior knowledge and coverups.

 

[5Lgreenback]

It was quite quiet.

Haha Its gonna have to get a lot louder to wake some folks from their coma's.

 

[5Lgreenback]

So what y’all think? Is she telling the truth, or is she now a crazy conspiracy theorist?

BBC reporting tower 7 collapsing 23 minutes before it actually happened..... priceless.

 

[Stg2Suby]

BBC is based in London so they are 5 hours ahead

 

[5Lgreenback]

BBC is based in London so they are 5 hours ahead

Um yes, that was taken into account....

Regardless of what time zone BBC happened to be in, they reported the building collapsing 23 minutes before it happened.

 

[JMCX]

Stay with me here.... We were talking about building 7, it wasn't hit by a plane.....

And believe it or not, the twin towers were actually built to withstand an airliner impact, hurricanes, etc.

They did survive the impacts. An extremely hot sustained fire took them out.

Do people really think they were prepped for demolition and then planes were precision guided into the floors where the collapse was to start?

Bldg 7 makes no sense though.

 

[5Lgreenback]

They did survive the impacts. An extremely hot sustained fire took them out.

Do people really think they were prepped for demolition and then planes were precision guided into the floors where the collapse was to start?

Bldg 7 makes no sense though.

Who knows, after all there were witness reports of explosions in the lobby and lower floors. And video footage showing windows exploding outwards well below the supposed impact points.

Have you looked into fires other steel building have survived.... Way hotter than those WTC fires and engulfed the whole buildings. The major structure remained intact, no collapse.

 

[snopro]

Personally one has to think a 767 flying into a building at 500 mph is going to cause some structural damage as well as the fire’s contributing to the problem. I wonder what the difference in heat is between drywall and office furniture burning compared to jet fuel burning.

 

[Chump]

Like everything else our gov/media says, it's probably best to take it with a grain of salt. I think it's safe to say at this point I sure wouldn't put it past them to bomb there own..

 

[ABMax24]

Who knows, after all there were witness reports of explosions in the lobby and lower floors. And video footage showing windows exploding outwards well below the supposed impact points.

Have you looked into fires other steel building have survived.... Way hotter than those WTC fires and engulfed the whole buildings. The major structure remained intact, no collapse.

Weird that there's no audio evidence on any of the hundreds of video recordings that day caught the sound of all these explosives' detonating.

How many of those other buildings had the sprinkler systems still functioning? Tower 7 didn't have an operable sprinkler system due to lack of water as the water main broke beneath the twin towers when they collapsed. The tower stood for 6 hrs with a fire burning inside it.

 

[snopro]

Lots of peeps out there don’t believe jets actually flew into the towers? Not sure how they tricked all the people that saw it live and the camera footage from the ground. Especially the second plane. Every news crew in the city was filming the towers by the time the second plane hit.

 

[5Lgreenback]

Weird that there's no audio evidence on any of the hundreds of video recordings that day caught the sound of all these explosives' detonating.

How many of those other buildings had the sprinkler systems still functioning? Tower 7 didn't have an operable sprinkler system due to lack of water as the water main broke beneath the twin towers when they collapsed. The tower stood for 6 hrs with a fire burning inside it.

There actually is (video), although it may be hard to find now. A black guard is being interviewed in the lobby and an explosion goes off in the background. Im sure theres more than that to be found if one looks as well.

That sprinkler claim is interesting, even if true it wouldnt be enough to collapse a steel building...

 

[5Lgreenback]

Lots of peeps out there don’t believe jets actually flew into the towers? Not sure how they tricked all the people that saw it live and the camera footage from the ground. Especially the second plane. Every news crew in the city was filming the towers by the time the second plane hit.

Ive seen a well done documentary on this, as crazy as it sounds I would say its plausible. It would involve hologram technology. One of the point they make is the airlines were travelling at 500mph or more, and at sea level at those speeds, an airliner would not be controllable.

 

[5Lgreenback]

So no thoughts on the BBC reporting building 7 collapsing before it collapsed....shakes up ones world view too much I guess.

 

[snopro]

Ive seen a well done documentary on this, as crazy as it sounds I would say its plausible. It would involve hologram technology. One of the point they make is the airlines were travelling at 500mph or more, and at sea level at those speeds, an airliner would not be controllable.

Was hologram tech even a thing in 2001? I don’t remember seeing any that far back?

 

[5Lgreenback]

Was hologram tech even a thing in 2001? I don’t remember seeing any that far back?

For us mere civilians, I believe there was some sketchy looking holograms. For military, intel agencies, etc... likely quite ahead of what we even see now.

 

[ABMax24]

There actually is (video), although it may be hard to find now. A black guard is being interviewed in the lobby and an explosion goes off in the background. Im sure theres more than that to be found if one looks as well.

That sprinkler claim is interesting, even if true it wouldnt be enough to collapse a steel building...

Well if the sprinklers were working why would the fire burn for 6 hours?

Circling again back to the loss of strength in steel at high temperatures, yes it would cause the building to collapse.

 

[ABMax24]

Ive seen a well done documentary on this, as crazy as it sounds I would say its plausible. It would involve hologram technology. One of the point they make is the airlines were travelling at 500mph or more, and at sea level at those speeds, an airliner would not be controllable.

While certainly not within the design parameters of the 767, they are certainly controllable at 500mph at sea level. If anything they are more controllable than at altitude as the air is denser near the ground and give the control surfaces greater control authority. The 767 has a max cruise speed of 567mph at 35,000ft, and a never exceed speed of 587 mph. Again, number set for safety and to protect the airframe from over stressing, something the terrorists cared nothing about.

And if you notice the second plane was pretty close to the edge of the south tower, while the first hit the north tower almost centered.

 

[5Lgreenback]

While certainly not within the design parameters of the 767, they are certainly controllable at 500mph at sea level. If anything they are more controllable than at altitude as the air is denser near the ground and give the control surfaces greater control authority. The 767 has a max cruise speed of 567mph at 35,000ft, and a never exceed speed of 587 mph. Again, number set for safety and to protect the airframe from over stressing, something the terrorists cared nothing about.

And if you notice the second plane was pretty close to the edge of the south tower, while the first hit the north tower almost centered.

VNE is about 400 mph at sea level, beyond that the excess drag and flight control surfaces at likely to get damaged. Generally when you go way beyond VNE in a aircraft, it starts to do scary/ weird things. Certainly enough to make it difficult to control.

 

[5Lgreenback]

Well if the sprinklers were working why would the fire burn for 6 hours?

Circling again back to the loss of strength in steel at high temperatures, yes it would cause the building to collapse.

Again, please look into other fires, this is nonsense.

Lil Duke posted a couple, whole buildings burnt..... no collapse