How does polaris do it?

Ryeser

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
955
Location
Parkland County, Alberta (Heart of GBCA)
Poo is at least $2000 cheaper than a Doo... I believe this is why many are going the way of the Poo again.... I also agree that the Doo is a superior sled, but Poo is very close and still affordable vs Doo.... the newest Poo machines are not blowing up anymore as well... LOL not like mine... I personally like the feel of a Poo vs the Doo, thats why I chose a Poo...

Ok , so the doo with a reported 20 hp more always, in your group, wins. Seen lots of comparisons on lots of different snow, and my experience is different from yours, by a mile. Granted usually stock to stock the Doo beats the Poo, but not always and definetly not by a lot. Not stock, no turbo, no big bore, different story, advantage Poo IMO. And thats great youre not impressed by my question was why is it even close, with 20 hp difference, every person who has experienced the Doo vs Pro clashes should be saying, Doo winner clear and evident. You are obviously dominant and so are all the other Doo s in your group, but sorry man, that aint the norm. I'm not bashing or boasting, sincere question, how can it even be close, and why. I can show you posts from the Nytro zealots also stating no poo or doo or cat ever beat them either, but talks cheap, evidence for 2 years on the snow is .... Pro and XP are fairly close, advantage Doo. But approx 15 % less hp, should be dominant.

And another question, why in a sport where its almost always been HP crazy, and HP the biggest factor in buying, are we now seeing so many guys choosing a lesser powered machine. Not the norm, and it sure as hell hasnt been the great service from Poo. Honest question not fishing.
 
Last edited:

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,097
Reaction score
43,303
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Poo is at least $2000 cheaper than a Doo... I believe this is why many are going the way of the Poo again.... I also agree that the Doo is a superior sled, but Poo is very close and still affordable vs Doo.... the newest Poo machines are not blowing up anymore as well... LOL not like mine... I personally like the feel of a Poo vs the Doo, thats why I chose a Poo...

That's also a good point. But are guys really paying 12000 before tax on there pro rmk 163?
 

Ryeser

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
955
Location
Parkland County, Alberta (Heart of GBCA)
That's also a good point. But are guys really paying 12000 before tax on there pro rmk 163?

Maybe I over stated the $2,000.... at least $1,500 is still a large difference to the average "Joe" And I wasnt just thinking the 163, I was thinking an overall comparison between Poo and Doo sleds, Poo is always less money...
 
Last edited:

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,379
Reaction score
14,335
Location
alberta
That's also a good point. But are guys really paying 12000 before tax on there pro rmk 163?

Sno cheks were $11,189 here. 2 buddies bought Doo snocheks $1400 more. And yeah i know, some of you guys got yours for $4158 cause you know someone. The real difference seems to be about $1500 approx difference. Not sure what a Pro would cost off the floor, the shops here aint having much trouble getting them out the door, so cant imagine theyre discounting them. I wouldnt.
 

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,379
Reaction score
14,335
Location
alberta
sorry, the numbers i paid are before tax out so add, $559 = $11748. 163 LE
 

Stickyfingers

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
240
Reaction score
343
Location
Olds
Maybe I over stated the $2,000.... at least $1,500 is still a large difference to the average "Joe" And I wasnt just thinking the 163, I was thinking an overall comparison between Poo and Doo sleds, Poo is always less money...

so buy the pro then buy a power addiction performance package or an slp performance package with the extra $1500 and put it up against the doo for the same amount of rubles$$$..... oh no I didnt:nono:
 

adamg

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
3,488
Reaction score
4,722
Location
S'toon,SK
Poo is at least $2000 cheaper than a Doo... I believe this is why many are going the way of the Poo again.... I also agree that the Doo is a superior sled, but Poo is very close and still affordable vs Doo.... the newest Poo machines are not blowing up anymore as well... LOL not like mine... I personally like the feel of a Poo vs the Doo, thats why I chose a Poo...

That may have been true in the past, but last spring when I was shopping I got the same price within $200 for a 2013 Pro 155 and a 2013 XM 154. Considering the 154 XM is equivalent to a 163 Pro, if anything the Doo was cheaper.

*all prices with 3 year warranty
 

leadfoot33

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
388
Reaction score
225
Location
prince george BC
locally here doo is significantly more atlesat $2000 i think they had them listed at $16000 and the poo and the cat at 13400 or somthing like that. but it was a huge difference.
 

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,379
Reaction score
14,335
Location
alberta
That may have been true in the past, but last spring when I was shopping I got the same price within $200 for a 2013 Pro 155 and a 2013 XM 154. Considering the 154 XM is equivalent to a 163 Pro, if anything the Doo was cheaper.

*all prices with 3 year warranty


Nice rationalizing, whatever makes ya feel good I guess. Hey , I know why don't you weigh em, then u can tell us all you got an extra 40 or 50 lbs more for only an extra $1500 bucks or so. But nope, sorry that won't work either. The Poo guy paid about $28 a lb you actually paid about $33 a lb. (note sarcasm).
 

clifford the big red dog

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
196
Reaction score
80
Location
lacombe ab
Money dont mean nothing by the time you add everything else up I have seen lots of junior riders ride the new pros and look good I think the sled is easier to ride and when you do some upgrades it I mean the poo just responds better and at the end of the day when they are broke down(poos doos or what ever)they are all junk, I think i payed enough money that they should all run good for the money I pay for all that plastic
 

adamg

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
3,488
Reaction score
4,722
Location
S'toon,SK
Nice rationalizing, whatever makes ya feel good I guess. Hey , I know why don't you weigh em, then u can tell us all you got an extra 40 or 50 lbs more for only an extra $1500 bucks or so. But nope, sorry that won't work either. The Poo guy paid about $28 a lb you actually paid about $33 a lb. (note sarcasm).

Signs of ranting: failure to respond to anything that was written, anger at a perceived slight that doesn't exist.
I posted a fact and you go off on me about weights and making poor decisions, neither of which are related to what I wrote.
 

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,379
Reaction score
14,335
Location
alberta
Signs of ranting: failure to respond to anything that was written, anger at a perceived slight that doesn't exist.
I posted a fact and you go off on me about weights and making poor decisions, neither of which are related to what I wrote.[

First rationalizing now denial. LOL. Nice dodge tho, might work for some.
 

ryan#1

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
219
Reaction score
171
Location
Terrace, BC
Ok , so the doo with a reported 20 hp more always, in your group, wins. Seen lots of comparisons on lots of different snow, and my experience is different from yours, by a mile. Granted usually stock to stock the Doo beats the Poo, but not always and definetly not by a lot. Not stock, no turbo, no big bore, different story, advantage Poo IMO. And thats great youre not impressed by my question was why is it even close, with 20 hp difference, every person who has experienced the Doo vs Pro clashes should be saying, Doo winner clear and evident. You are obviously dominant and so are all the other Doo s in your group, but sorry man, that aint the norm. I'm not bashing or boasting, sincere question, how can it even be close, and why. I can show you posts from the Nytro zealots also stating no poo or doo or cat ever beat them either, but talks cheap, evidence for 2 years on the snow is .... Pro and XP are fairly close, advantage Doo. But approx 15 % less hp, should be dominant.

And another question, why in a sport where its almost always been HP crazy, and HP the biggest factor in buying, are we now seeing so many guys choosing a lesser powered machine. Not the norm, and it sure as hell hasnt been the great service from Poo. Honest question not fishing.

I'd have to disagree... why would the doo be dominant based on numbers? look at the hp:weight ratio the difference is negligible (like 1-2%) b/c the added weight of the doo cancels out the HP advantage. The rider, the rider's weight, sled set up, and traction will drive the difference in performance. So stock to stock they should be pretty close which they are. In my experience the 3 800's are all pretty close.
 

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,379
Reaction score
14,335
Location
alberta
exactly. only thing giving the doo the edge is the extra traction. not the hp

Sorry don't agree, we've changed out a few pro s to a 2.5 Camo extreme track which I believe is at least equal to the Doo track (I dont like the poo track) and the circumstances while competing didn't change a lot in deep snow. On harder snow the CE is way better. Good points made by ryan1, so imagine how cool it would be if the poo gained 10 or so hp. And you wouldn't have to put up with the goofy Doo steering angle.
 
Top Bottom