Can they catch up ?

Longhairfreak

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
3,261
Reaction score
3,096
Location
Spruce Grove
With the way the Government is restricting emissions its gonna be a long time until the big 4 will touch the wedge.
 

prairie-rider800

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
168
Reaction score
275
Location
Edmonton, AB
The x3 is a turd compared to this doo track. It's lighter, has better paddles for marginal snow conditions. And has a lot less rolling resistance with the small long ports. Oh! And the paddles are damn near 16" wide. Not 14!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -

Just a thought, but doesn't this thing need to prove itself on the snow before you can claim everything about it is pure gold? haha
I mean I'm sure your right and it will work great but everything you are saying is like this sleds already spent a few seasons on the snow!
 

LinkTank

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
219
Reaction score
328
Location
Sherwood Park
Maxwell You're talking like you've had a test ride already? If not then you can't really say for sure how much difference drivers and a dropped chain case will make. At this point without a on snow comparison it's all just speculation. .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There was a T3 simulator day. Should have been there!!!
 

Teth-Air

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
3,785
Reaction score
8,085
Location
Calgary/Nelson
What a joke, the Doo was already fat, now with this 174 3" it is going to be even worse in the trees, How can you spin that track and bank the sled, it's going straight into the tree well. No doubt it will out climb any other brand but most riders I know have graduated from that avy prone type of riding to something that takes skill. Maybe they should now look at a 201" track? Obvious the idea is the longer the track the better for some?
 
Last edited:

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
109,920
Reaction score
108,768
Location
Milo,Alberta
What a joke, the Doo was already fat, now with this 174 3" it is going to be even worse in the trees, How can you spin that track and bank the sled, it's going straight into the tree well. No doubt it will out climb any other brand but most riders I know have graduated from that avy prone type of riding to something that takes skill. Maybe they should now look at a 201" track? Obvious the idea is the longer the track the better for some?
Thats most riders you know Chris. Compare the snow left in the tree's and then have a boo at Superbowl on your way out. There are still alot of guys plugging away at the same hill all day. Why? I will never understand but to each there own. Lol.
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,105
Reaction score
43,347
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
What a joke, the Doo was already fat, now with this 174 3" it is going to be even worse in the trees, How can you spin that track and bank the sled, it's going straight into the tree well. No doubt it will out climb any other brand but most riders I know have graduated from that avy prone type of riding to something that takes skill. Maybe they should now look at a 201" track? Obvious the idea is the longer the track the better for some?

Lol ahh post of The year right there. Anyone who truly rides the steep deep tight trees knows this thing will take it to the next level. Not the other way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
 
Top Bottom