Sled deck on 1/2 ton?

adamg

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
4,675
Location
S'toon,SK
Deck.jpg
 

tmo1620

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
4,021
Reaction score
7,964
Location
Whitecourt
I've loaded machines up like that before. I'll haul my sleds across town with my 7' deck, but the extension goes on for the long haul.

Did one trip to McBride without the extension. First time using the new 7ft Truckboss. First and Last time. 7ft isn't long enough for sleds.

I have no issues with a 7’ deck and no extension, overhangs a bit but I’m also not running a 165 or 175 for that matter
 

Dawizman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2014
Messages
2,842
Reaction score
10,093
Location
Cold Lake, AB
I have no issues with a 7’ deck and no extension, overhangs a bit but I’m also not running a 165 or 175 for that matter
My 153s only have a couple lugs taking half the weight of the sled. The skid hangs down just like the Polaris in the above picture. With the extension, at least half the skid is supported.
 

tmo1620

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
4,021
Reaction score
7,964
Location
Whitecourt
My 153s only have a couple lugs taking half the weight of the sled. The skid hangs down just like the Polaris in the above picture. With the extension, at least half the skid is supported.

The way I run a ratchet strap looped from bumper down under the track to the deck and hooked back to itself lifts the rear skid to sit flat and rest on the strap and also applied forward pressure and rests more weight on the deck, not actually to bad at all
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,729
Reaction score
20,669
Location
Salmon Arm
7' decks need an extension for 163/174's and should have one for 153's. Why do I see so many guys with their sleds sitting back on the deck too? Run those ski loops up tight against the headache rack.
 

Ballzdeep

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2017
Messages
1,967
Reaction score
6,860
Location
St Albert
7' decks need an extension for 163/174's and should have one for 153's. Why do I see so many guys with their sleds sitting back on the deck too? Run those ski loops up tight against the headache rack.

if ya zoom in you can see his superclamp is pretty much touching his spindles....i thought the same thing...move that bitch up.
 

tmo1620

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
4,021
Reaction score
7,964
Location
Whitecourt
That deck almost looks like a 6’ deck not a 7’, if that deck is 7’ long that sled is 14’ long by the look of the picture, this is mine on a 7’ deck, it’s not so bad
1bca8ca5b41112a8d4441e9aa95601f0.jpg
 

Tchetek

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
2,817
Reaction score
7,170
Location
Alberta
Magga cab has a longer box than that crew can. 6’4 vs 5’7”.

That polaris is just drop and rolled farther back plus a longer track.
 

acesup800

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,454
Reaction score
2,642
Location
BC
7' decks need an extension for 163/174's and should have one for 153's. Why do I see so many guys with their sleds sitting back on the deck too? Run those ski loops up tight against the headache rack.
Doesn't matter the length of track, same amount of lugs on the deck. When you have all that weight bouncing down the highway on 3 lugs and 6" of rail, make you wonder....
 
Top Bottom