I've loaded machines up like that before. I'll haul my sleds across town with my 7' deck, but the extension goes on for the long haul.
I've loaded machines up like that before. I'll haul my sleds across town with my 7' deck, but the extension goes on for the long haul.
Did one trip to McBride without the extension. First time using the new 7ft Truckboss. First and Last time. 7ft isn't long enough for sleds.
My 153s only have a couple lugs taking half the weight of the sled. The skid hangs down just like the Polaris in the above picture. With the extension, at least half the skid is supported.I have no issues with a 7’ deck and no extension, overhangs a bit but I’m also not running a 165 or 175 for that matter
My 153s only have a couple lugs taking half the weight of the sled. The skid hangs down just like the Polaris in the above picture. With the extension, at least half the skid is supported.
7' decks need an extension for 163/174's and should have one for 153's. Why do I see so many guys with their sleds sitting back on the deck too? Run those ski loops up tight against the headache rack.
Magga cab has a longer box than that crew can. 6’4 vs 5’7”.
That polaris is just drop and rolled farther back plus a longer track.
Only the halfers can get the 5'7. HDs all get 6'4".Magga cab has a longer box than that crew can. 6’4 vs 5’7”.
That polaris is just drop and rolled farther back plus a longer track.
Been to Sicamous have you
Doesn't matter the length of track, same amount of lugs on the deck. When you have all that weight bouncing down the highway on 3 lugs and 6" of rail, make you wonder....7' decks need an extension for 163/174's and should have one for 153's. Why do I see so many guys with their sleds sitting back on the deck too? Run those ski loops up tight against the headache rack.