lloydguy
Active VIP Member
Taking property to play a pro active role to protect people from the possibility of a violent outbreak?
I don't see that point of view what so ever,and I'm not even a gun person in any way. The people
can have their gun's back at a later time if they can prove ownership. What a joke.Long gun's are
NOT Illegal and I am only guess here ,but I would assume 80% of people wouldn't have the proper
paper trail of ownership to get them back.
Realistically out of all of the things that I own,my truck and bike are the only thing's that I could
PROVE that are mine.(through bill of sales and registration).If they were indeed taken with the
intent of preventing some sort of a violent outbreak,then why stop with gun's,why not take every
knife, pointy object and projectile ?Those are weapons too.
Act's like this are moving North american's one step closer to a communist state.
I don't see that point of view what so ever,and I'm not even a gun person in any way. The people
can have their gun's back at a later time if they can prove ownership. What a joke.Long gun's are
NOT Illegal and I am only guess here ,but I would assume 80% of people wouldn't have the proper
paper trail of ownership to get them back.
Realistically out of all of the things that I own,my truck and bike are the only thing's that I could
PROVE that are mine.(through bill of sales and registration).If they were indeed taken with the
intent of preventing some sort of a violent outbreak,then why stop with gun's,why not take every
knife, pointy object and projectile ?Those are weapons too.
Act's like this are moving North american's one step closer to a communist state.