RCMP took guns from High River homes.

Eagle

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
214
Reaction score
828
Location
Slave Lake
K let me ask you something. If you want to give your money to a specific disaster or person and are told that money will go to that disaster or person, and you find out that its going to "tim buck two" how would you feel?
 

Riverjet

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Messages
1,703
Reaction score
1,388
Location
Prince George
I'm not sure what the numbers are but I'm sure I read somewhere that most of the money that people donate to the Canadian Red Cross goes to the wages of the people running it. Many other charities do the same.

P.S Red Cross is the biggest crock.. If you want to donate to the flood victims don't use Red Cross. Not everyone knows that the money you donate to Red Cross does not mean it will go to who you want it to goto. lots of the money designated to Slave lake did not goto Slave Lake. Red Cross can give your money to anyone they want..in any country. How do you like that? Alot of local businesses found out the hard way.
 

somethingnuw

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
1,087
Location
High Prairie
Guns are equal to child pornography and illegal drugs in your book? Last time I checked guns weren't illegal.

You're okay with the RCMP busting your door in without a warrant making sure you don't have a drugs, kiddie porn or guns?


thats not what he said at all...
 

catinthehat

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
2,458
Location
Cranbrook BC
I guess that if the cops came across a grow op or a pile of child pornography when searching for people (which is what they were doing) they should just ignore and move on. Unsafely stored guns were taken and are to be returned. Mountain out of a frigging molehill.
My point was that they have no right or reason to enter private homes without valid prove of wrongdoing, Anybody that has ever been evacuated for any reason should be very concerned if they get evacuated again. Having been evacuated twice in twenty years for forest fires I now will not evacuate without being forced out in handcuffs for fear the same people who are supposed to protect my property will raid it. I have three Grandchildren who have free rein throughout my house so you can bet my guns are all locked up and secure but who knows what they could find. So far all we have to go by is the cops word that all these guns were in plain sight, they are not always paragons of truth. Ok that's my point of view, now everybody can jump on me I got broad shoulders.
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,529
Location
Alberta
After this I can see that people will refuse to leave when this happens again. Unfortunately, someone will probably die in another disaster after staying when they shouldn't have, all for the fear of the authorities overstepping their authority and common sense. If the RCMP had regular patrols in place they should have found anyone who wanted to be taken out. They're aware of who stayed to protect their property. There was no reports of them finding anyone ( dead or alive) in the house to house searches. And they keep saying that they can't let anyone into high river because its unsafe. If that is true, isn't it a better idea to use your resources to MAKE it safe? I can't seriously believe that the threat to overall safety existed INSIDE the houses of those displaced.

Comparing high river to the other areas affected, one notes a much higher police to remediation worker ratio, far less effort to dewatering the town, a total control of media access ( including direct overflights by media helicopters) and the greatest effort anywhere to create and maintain a secure police perimeter.

I know members of the fire department in high river and they say there's a lack of planning, equipment and manpower to clean up the mess, but lots of police. The effort by the province there is obviously lacking. Any push to allow residents back in in the last day or so is only because of the negative press coverage.

If one was given to conspiracy theories, is all this because its the wild rose party's leader's own riding? Is it to determine as a test case how far the government can go in a local state of emergency to gain control of the populace before its legally excessive?

Or is it simply a case of more incompetence from a chronically incompetent government. Whatever it is, it worries me that the police are the ones firmly in control of a town, with the elected representatives nowhere to be seen, and the civil rights of the residents continually being abused in the name of "safety".
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
108,810
Reaction score
105,765
Location
Milo,Alberta
RCMP kinda got thrown under the bus today. Prime Minister Harper told them to focus on security and helping people instead of messing with guns. City of Calgary said they could have done this but chose not to in Calgary. Even non gun owners are blasting the cops decision. Someone is going to feel the pain over this.....
 

Bandit

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
164
Reaction score
200
Location
W.R.
I get such a kick out of this. And the RCMP wonder why they have such a bad image over the last several years, between stunts like this and tasering people to death, or kicking an unarmed man who was kneeling on the ground in the face. Heck, even arresting a senior citizen for plowing snow with his atv at an old folks home.

It used to be that people respected the RCMP and were happy to see them. Now days its seems the first reaction when approached by an RCMP, is wondering how badly he's going to try to screw you over.
 

pipes

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
26,688
Reaction score
37,472
Location
Bonnyville Alberta
News Bulletins." <cssa-cila-e-news@lists.cssa-cila.org>

Subject: [CSSA-CILA E-News] It can't happen here? Police outrage in Alberta by out-of-control RCMP.

Date: 27 June, 2013 4:44:42 PM MDT

To: Team CSSA E-NEWS <cssa-cila-e-news@lists.cssa-cila.org>

Reply-To: info@cdnshootingsports.org


CANADIAN SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION / CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

TEAM CSSA SPECIAL REPORT 2- June 27, 2013





It can't happen here? Police outrage in Alberta by out-of-control RCMP.

Residents in High River we forced to evacuate their homes. They didn't have a choice. Those who refused to leave would be physically removed. In High River Alberta the RCMP broke into the homes of Canadians and stole their firearms. "The guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership," said Sgt. Brian Topham."



------

‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP sieze guns from High River homes

‘It’s just like Nazi Germany,’ says resident


By Trevor Howell, Calgary Herald June 27, 2013 3:40 PM

Evacuees confronted the RCMP on the northwest corner of town in a bid to enter the Town of High River on Thursday, June 27th 2013, one week after the Highwood River Flooded leaving the whole town empty. RCMP laid a spike belt down across the road to prevent them from travelling down it.

Photograph by: Lorraine Hjalte , Calgary Herald

HIGH RIVER — RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a “substantial amount” of firearms from homes in the evacuated town of High River.

“We just want to make sure that all of those things are in a spot that we control, simply because of what they are,” said Sgt. Brian Topham.

“People have a significant amount of money invested in firearms ... so we put them in a place that we control and that they’re safe.”

That news didn’t sit well with a crowd of frustrated residents who had planned to breach a police checkpoint northwest of the town as an evacuation order stretched into its eighth day.

“I find that absolutely incredible that they have the right to go into a person’s belongings out of their home,” said resident Brenda Lackey, after learning Mounties have been taking residents’ guns. “When people find out about this there’s going to be untold hell to pay.”

About 30 RCMP officers set up a blockade at the checkpoint, preventing 50 residents from walking into the town. Dozens more police cars, lights on, could be seen lining streets in the town on standby.

Officers laid down a spike belt to stop anyone from attempting to drive past the blockade. That action sent the crowd of residents into a rage.

“What’s next? Tear gas?” shouted one resident.

“It’s just like Nazi Germany, just taking orders,” shouted another.

“This is the reason the U.S. has the right to bear arms,” said Charles Timpano, pointing to the group of Mounties.

Officers were ordered to fall back about an hour into the standoff in order to diffuse the situation and listen to residents’ concerns.

“We don’t want our town to turn into another New Orleans,” said resident Jeff Langford. “The longer that the water stays in our houses the worse it’s going to be. We’ll either be bulldozing them or burning them down because we’ve got an incompetent government.”

Langford blasted High River Mayor Emile Blokland over comments made Wednesday in which Blokland said residents will be allowed to return after businesses, such as hardware and drug stores, are opened.

“It was ridiculous,” said Langford. “I think he’s a puppet on a string.”

Langford said Premier Redford should come to High River to address residents’ concerns and provide information.

“This is at the highest tension,” he said. “What’s going to happen next is that people are just going to be walking across these fields, and I don’t care if they put hundreds of thousand of police officers there, they’re not going to stop from getting in.”

Sgt. Topham said he didn’t know when residents would be allowed to return to their homes. “People much higher up are going to make those decisions,” he said.

He did confirm that officer relied on forced entry to get into numerous houses during the early stages of the flood because of an “urgent need”, said Topham.

Police are no longer forcing themselves into homes and the residences that were forced open will be secured, he said.

Topham said the confiscated firearms have been inventoried and are secured at an RCMP detachment. He was not at liberty to say how many firearms had been confiscated.

“We have seized a large quantity of firearms simply because they were left by residents in their places,” said Topham.

The guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership, Topham added.

Residents promised to returned to the checkpoint at noon every day until they are allowed to return to their homes.

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

-------


THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT!



The CSSA is the voice of the sport shooter and firearms enthusiast in Canada. Our national membership supports and promotes Canada's firearms heritage, traditional target shooting competition, modern action shooting sports, hunting, and archery. We support and sponsor competitions and youth programs that promote these Canadian heritage activities.


To join or donate to the CSSA, visit:
------
To subscribe to the CSSA-CILA E-NEWS, send email to: cssa-cila-e-news-subscribe@lists.cssa-cila.org or visit CSSA-CILA-E-News Info Page.
To unsubscribe send email to: cssa-cila-e-news-unsubscribe@lists.cssa-cila.org
To change your address or manage your subscription options, visit: CSSA-CILA-E-News list: member options login page

-------
CANADIAN SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION / CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION
116 Galaxy Blvd, Etobicoke ON M9W 4Y6
Phone 416-679-9959, Fax: 416-679-9910
Toll Free: 1-888-873-4339
E-Mail: info@cdnshootingsports.org
Website www.cdnshootingsports.org


 

pipes

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
26,688
Reaction score
37,472
Location
Bonnyville Alberta
News Bulletins." <cssa-cila-e-news@lists.cssa-cila.org>

Subject: [CSSA-CILA E-News] It can't happen here? Police outrage in Alberta by out-of-control RCMP.

Date: 27 June, 2013 4:44:42 PM MDT

To: Team CSSA E-NEWS <cssa-cila-e-news@lists.cssa-cila.org>

Reply-To: info@cdnshootingsports.org


CANADIAN SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION / CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

TEAM CSSA SPECIAL REPORT 2- June 27, 2013





It can't happen here? Police outrage in Alberta by out-of-control RCMP.

Residents in High River we forced to evacuate their homes. They didn't have a choice. Those who refused to leave would be physically removed. In High River Alberta the RCMP broke into the homes of Canadians and stole their firearms. "The guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership," said Sgt. Brian Topham."



------

‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP sieze guns from High River homes

‘It’s just like Nazi Germany,’ says resident


By Trevor Howell, Calgary Herald June 27, 2013 3:40 PM

Evacuees confronted the RCMP on the northwest corner of town in a bid to enter the Town of High River on Thursday, June 27th 2013, one week after the Highwood River Flooded leaving the whole town empty. RCMP laid a spike belt down across the road to prevent them from travelling down it.

Photograph by: Lorraine Hjalte , Calgary Herald

HIGH RIVER — RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a “substantial amount” of firearms from homes in the evacuated town of High River.

“We just want to make sure that all of those things are in a spot that we control, simply because of what they are,” said Sgt. Brian Topham.

“People have a significant amount of money invested in firearms ... so we put them in a place that we control and that they’re safe.”

That news didn’t sit well with a crowd of frustrated residents who had planned to breach a police checkpoint northwest of the town as an evacuation order stretched into its eighth day.

“I find that absolutely incredible that they have the right to go into a person’s belongings out of their home,” said resident Brenda Lackey, after learning Mounties have been taking residents’ guns. “When people find out about this there’s going to be untold hell to pay.”

About 30 RCMP officers set up a blockade at the checkpoint, preventing 50 residents from walking into the town. Dozens more police cars, lights on, could be seen lining streets in the town on standby.

Officers laid down a spike belt to stop anyone from attempting to drive past the blockade. That action sent the crowd of residents into a rage.

“What’s next? Tear gas?” shouted one resident.

“It’s just like Nazi Germany, just taking orders,” shouted another.

“This is the reason the U.S. has the right to bear arms,” said Charles Timpano, pointing to the group of Mounties.

Officers were ordered to fall back about an hour into the standoff in order to diffuse the situation and listen to residents’ concerns.

“We don’t want our town to turn into another New Orleans,” said resident Jeff Langford. “The longer that the water stays in our houses the worse it’s going to be. We’ll either be bulldozing them or burning them down because we’ve got an incompetent government.”

Langford blasted High River Mayor Emile Blokland over comments made Wednesday in which Blokland said residents will be allowed to return after businesses, such as hardware and drug stores, are opened.

“It was ridiculous,” said Langford. “I think he’s a puppet on a string.”

Langford said Premier Redford should come to High River to address residents’ concerns and provide information.

“This is at the highest tension,” he said. “What’s going to happen next is that people are just going to be walking across these fields, and I don’t care if they put hundreds of thousand of police officers there, they’re not going to stop from getting in.”

Sgt. Topham said he didn’t know when residents would be allowed to return to their homes. “People much higher up are going to make those decisions,” he said.

He did confirm that officer relied on forced entry to get into numerous houses during the early stages of the flood because of an “urgent need”, said Topham.

Police are no longer forcing themselves into homes and the residences that were forced open will be secured, he said.

Topham said the confiscated firearms have been inventoried and are secured at an RCMP detachment. He was not at liberty to say how many firearms had been confiscated.

“We have seized a large quantity of firearms simply because they were left by residents in their places,” said Topham.

The guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership, Topham added.

Residents promised to returned to the checkpoint at noon every day until they are allowed to return to their homes.

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

-------


THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT!



The CSSA is the voice of the sport shooter and firearms enthusiast in Canada. Our national membership supports and promotes Canada's firearms heritage, traditional target shooting competition, modern action shooting sports, hunting, and archery. We support and sponsor competitions and youth programs that promote these Canadian heritage activities.


To join or donate to the CSSA, visit:
------
To subscribe to the CSSA-CILA E-NEWS, send email to: cssa-cila-e-news-subscribe@lists.cssa-cila.org or visit CSSA-CILA-E-News Info Page.
To unsubscribe send email to: cssa-cila-e-news-unsubscribe@lists.cssa-cila.org
To change your address or manage your subscription options, visit: CSSA-CILA-E-News list: member options login page

-------
CANADIAN SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION / CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION
116 Galaxy Blvd, Etobicoke ON M9W 4Y6
Phone 416-679-9959, Fax: 416-679-9910
Toll Free: 1-888-873-4339
E-Mail: info@cdnshootingsports.org
Website www.cdnshootingsports.org


 

LID

Active VIP Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
1,102
Location
Calgary and Rocky Mtns
Talking about the gun headlines, not the flood or not being able to get back into houses. Just to clarify
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,800
Reaction score
17,795
Location
Prince George
This is certainly an eye opener. If heads do not roll over this my trust of the RCMP will be at an all time low.
 

chickenman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
383
Reaction score
596
Location
edmonton
I'll tell you how facked up they are in High River. Many many folks left in such a hurry they left their cats behind thinking they would be able to came back in a few days and feed or get them. Nope. The authorities have not let anyone in to feed their pets. They SAY that when they did their door to door search they fed and watered the pets. I guess we will see what kind of mess people will go home to. I still can not figure out what harm could come from letting people in to check on their homes. I don't mean let them in to stay but to check on their homes. ESPECIALLY the ones who were never flooded out. There are pictures on the High River FB site showing a home with a busted door and left wide open. I wonder how many pets would stay in the house.

The problem with letting only certain people in is that it is to easy to loose control of them. They have to employ an all or none stand ( just like they did in Slave Lake ) Thats the only way that can say that they did everything they could so that people could not get hurt.
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
112,063
Reaction score
86,098
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
The problem with letting only certain people in is that it is to easy to loose control of them. They have to employ an all or none stand ( just like they did in Slave Lake ) Thats the only way that can say that they did everything they could so that people could not get hurt.

Yes, some serious issues with decision making. Even tho' it is a dire situation, we see a much needed "revamped disaster plan" that could be implemented for such disasters. This isn't rocket science. Concerns about safety are imperative but there has to be better ways to instigate them.

Once again, the authorities are damned if they doo and damned if they don't. Tough situation and not everyone is going to be happy about certain decisions. The breaking down of locked doors, for whatever reason, doesn't seem just/right to me. Even in an emergency, there must be rules and legislation for the authorities to follow, even in a declared state of emergency.

As I see it, the difference between Calgary and High River is the fact that Nemshi has a large contingent of "paid staff" who are well trained in disaster response. No presence of RCMP because it is a city police force and under the control of a "disaster response team" with the police only being one entity of many. In High River, the poor mayor is so far out of his comfort zone and realm of expertise that it has turned into a doony-brook for the media who themselves aren't helping.

Just as I see it from my comfortable arm chair, high in the Rocky Mountains.........I really feel for all the people who have been and will be affected by this disaster in the days/weeks/months to come.
 

Summiteer

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
5,883
Reaction score
3,508
Location
Whitecourt, Ab
They interviewed a lawyer in Ontario today on the radio who specializes in Firearm litigation in all provinces of Canada and the NWT. He said what is happening in High River is unprecedented in all of Canada. He said what the RCMP are doing is illegal. There are only 2 ways they can enter a house legally. With a search warrant or if there is a feeling someone inside is in imminent danger for there life. If the owner is 50 miles away living with friends or in a RV park then they cannot enter with out a search warrant. He thinks there will be alot of lawsuits before this is over. Surprisingly he never offered his services?
I'm guessing that there are specific circumstances such as when a state of emergency has been declared, where police are allowed to enter a home without a warrant. If not, we'll soon know. Of course with the long history of tyrannical rule, government seizure of private property and unlawful imprisonment of citizens it may be best to panic right away.
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
112,063
Reaction score
86,098
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
A house and some out buildings were going to go over a bank into a creek/river in BC this week. According to the media, the local authorities called a state of emergency so that they could take a back-hoe to the buildings and remove them so that they didn't compromise some down stream bridges. Without the declared state of emergency they would just have to sit and watch and see what happened.

So, I'm thinking the state of emergency gives powers that may be too encompassing in our minds. Maybe some changes to this power need to be looked into.
 
Top Bottom