No diet for Skidoo?

BIGFOOT

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,079
Location
Hidden zone
ya.. 10 extra hp, t motion skid to assist in making a heavier sled feel like a lighter sled, an
d that MASSIVE flipper they just added for traction. i would say they are refining and trimming the XM chassis slowly and we will continually see 5-10lb weight losses every season. and i think with this 174 3" track they are setting themselves up for adding an aditional 10-15hp out of the etec in a future realease. THAT would be a monster.

Soon doo should be onto the glue thing also. One never knows it just may stick ?
 

CamoKVF700

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
729
Reaction score
1,797
Location
Sherwood Park
Freeride vs Summit? How much heavier? Freeride max is 154...

Sent while wishing I was on my snowbike
 

deaner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
3,248
Reaction score
11,308
Location
Creston, BC
Skidoo builds a great sled, but to say that we dont want them lighter is ridiculous. Get a sled close to the 400lbs mark and the fun factor goes up huge in my opinion. Not saying they will get that light from the factory, but at least polaris is trying. Be nice to see doo do the same.
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,105
Reaction score
43,341
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Skidoo builds a great sled, but to say that we dont want them lighter is ridiculous. Get a sled close to the 400lbs mark and the fun factor goes up huge in my opinion. Not saying they will get that light from the factory, but at least polaris is trying. Be nice to see doo do the same.

i dont think anyone can deny lighter is better. but at what cost and at what pain to the consumer?

ive smashed my xm off alot of trees stumps and rocks and its still ticking so can it get lighter? sure....as long as its as strong or stronger and not just on paper. the PRO RMK is not stronger but it is lighter. you can say things like the materials used and the structure design is more rigid with higher strength materials but until you start twisting, bending ,smashing ,jarring ,vibrating them around you dont know forsure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDK

K45

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
265
Reaction score
643
Location
Alberta
i dont think anyone can deny lighter is better. but at what cost and at what pain to the consumer?

ive smashed my xm off alot of trees stumps and rocks and its still ticking so can it get lighter? sure....as long as its as strong or stronger and not just on paper. the PRO RMK is not stronger but it is lighter. you can say things like the materials used and the structure design is more rigid with higher strength materials but until you start twisting, bending ,smashing ,jarring ,vibrating them around you dont know forsure.

So I see your sleds up for sale next month ?
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,105
Reaction score
43,341
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
So I see your sleds up for sale next month ?

ya? if anyone can sell a snowmobile that they say havent smashed off trees rocks and stumps and ridden hard in the mountains they LYING to your face. they are all straight sleds. if your interested come take a look and bring a measuring tape. if not nice attempt at crashing my sale i guess but ive got nothing to hide.
 

NeilV

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
203
Reaction score
470
Location
Busby Alberta
i dont think anyone can deny lighter is better. but at what cost and at what pain to the consumer?

ive smashed my xm off alot of trees stumps and rocks and its still ticking so can it get lighter? sure....as long as its as strong or stronger and not just on paper. the PRO RMK is not stronger but it is lighter. you can say things like the materials used and the structure design is more rigid with higher strength materials but until you start twisting, bending ,smashing ,jarring ,vibrating them around you dont know forsure.

Not sure how you figure the xm is stronger than the pro? I have owned both and I can tell you the pro has a stronger front end for sure! I hammered a lot of trees with my pro and it held up great. Bump one tree with my xm and now I have a twisted tunnel:confused::confused: I still think the xm is a better sled all around. I would just like to see it a little more durable.
uploadfromtaptalk1394948535186.jpg uploadfromtaptalk1394948572726.jpg uploadfromtaptalk1394948618922.jpg
 

Vance Matheson

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
1,488
Reaction score
1,150
Location
edmonton
Not sure how you figure the xm is stronger than the pro? I have owned both and I can tell you the pro has a stronger front end for sure! I hammered a lot of trees with my pro and it held up great. Bump one tree with my xm and now I have a twisted tunnel:confused::confused: I still think the xm is a better sled all around. I would just like to see it a little more durable.
View attachment 168793View attachment 168794View attachment 168795


its definitely twisted...now what?? is it written off?
 

Dannyturbo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
314
Reaction score
594
Location
Valemount
Have watched a couple videos on sled comparison and wet weight vs wet weight apparently the pro packs a lot more snow under the chassis up too 100 pounds + apparently and weighs the same as a Xm packed full of snow with less horsepower.. Could be a bull**** article but then again o.o


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Dannyturbo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
314
Reaction score
594
Location
Valemount
I think we might see a couple guys at the end of the year climbing monster on a stock t3 174 doo next year o.o


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

FranktheTank

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
624
Reaction score
1,232
Location
Regina/Bc
I think we might see a couple guys at the end of the year climbing monster on a stock t3 174 doo next year o.o


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Monster has been climbed in the spring on stock sleds shorter than a 174.
 
Top Bottom