doorfx
Active VIP Member
There is no truth any longer.
Given that our daily driver spent another week in the shop for a blown rear main seal, and the fact that it must be plugged in at anything colder than -25 to have it start, I've been curious about how the Tesla's perform in the cold in terms of warmup. Found this on the Model 3, I'm impressed, I knew the heating system was good, but didn't realize that it was literally minutes to bring the cabin up to room temperature. Now got me wondering how Tesla's new heat pump system is working. If Tesla would install a Supercharger in Whitecourt this could actually be a viable option.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL9zveDz8H0&ab_channel=SaskTesla
They heat up very quick. You can program it to be warm at a certain time everyday (mon-fri ready to drive at 7am for example) as well. Heat pump will get you a little better range but the biggest thing in winter driving is starting with a warm battery. This is why you want a proper home charging set up for these frigid conditions. 120v charging in -25 is basically useless. 500km range is 250-300 in -30.
If we bought a Tesla I'd have the Wall Connector installed on the outside of the garage, I have more than enough power left over in my 100amp house panel to put it on a 60 amp breaker, as long as there isn't something in the electrical code preventing this.
I think the heat pump is a game changer, from what I can find the Y is getting up to 20% better efficiency than the 3 is at around -10 temps.
The biggest kicker for us is still the lack of charging infrastructure, without a high output charger between Grande Prairie and Edmonton it makes a day trip to Edmonton and back almost impossible, especially in the winter.
So where should the funding come from to develop these charging stations ?
Looking at the comparison it appears the Tesla is a better value but really when one is spending $140,000 on a vehicle, they have a different perspective on value than I do so just may cough up an extra $45,000 for the Porsche badge. I doubt one would be able to register much of a difference between the 0 to 60 MPH times as both would be pretty intense. I seldom run full throttle from a standstill in any of my vehicles so imagine one would need to do so even less in either of these two vehicles.
I personally going to wait until the 4680 battery comes out in the model 3. Hopefully that will start in the next year or so....
Based on that theory Panasonic shares might be a steal right now at under $14, they not only produce a 4680 but are partnered with Tesla to set up and run the Nevada Gigafactory.
Looking at the comparison it appears the Tesla is a better value but really when one is spending $140,000 on a vehicle, they have a different perspective on value than I do so just may cough up an extra $45,000 for the Porsche badge. I doubt one would be able to register much of a difference between the 0 to 60 MPH times as both would be pretty intense. I seldom run full throttle from a standstill in any of my vehicles so imagine one would need to do so even less in either of these two vehicles.
I personally going to wait until the 4680 battery comes out in the model 3. Hopefully that will start in the next year or so....
Tesla is $190k and Taycan is $215k in CAD$.
The plaid+ will have 4680 cells and run the quarter mile under 9 seconds. But yeah $140k USD is a lot of money. But it will be the fastest production car ever made so technically it’s a bargain.
It’s really tough not to be awed by the performance that the DC tractive motors are capable of producing.....if they could somehow come up with a more viable power source though......