Last seven years have been the hottest since mankind began

ABMax24

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
4,912
Reaction score
14,245
Location
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
Capitol flight, wouldn’t be transferring to China, had North America ruled in its Unions. Union demands, increased wages, benefits, pensions, etc. All contribute to unappreciation of Capitol. Money flows to where it’s appreciated (hence the word appreciation), always has. China appreciates Capitol > Greater than Westernized, Union government, and private sector unions. The labour wants bigger cut of the pie, without taking on any risk (This why companies such as Amazon are imcreasingly utilize robotics to replace labour (work 24/7, no benefits required)). Unions have destroyed Canada, North America. Greenies will argue the environment argument, however China cares less about environment (although China has become cleaner than 30-40 years ago), China cares more about the productivity of it’s people. Therefore China will rise to the most powerful nation in the world (1.5 Billion chinese already). Over next decades Better learn Mandarin.......China will occur threats from India for superpowers. America will fall to third.

Absolutely, but unfortunately the choice in Canada today appears to be pay union workers a high rate to produce a little work, or pay them to sit on the couch. There are so many leaches in Canada today that a government will never get voted in if they intend to end this system.

You explain a concept that the public has generally become disconnected from. Money is a placeholder for productivity, if a country doesn't have any productivity that country's money doesn't have any value.
 
Last edited:

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,529
Location
Alberta
Capitol flight, wouldn’t be transferring to China, had North America ruled in its Unions. Union demands, increased wages, benefits, pensions, etc. All contribute to unappreciation of Capitol. Money flows to where it’s appreciated (hence the word appreciation), always has. China appreciates Capitol > Greater than Westernized, Union government, and private sector unions. The labour wants bigger cut of the pie, without taking on any risk (This why companies such as Amazon are imcreasingly utilize robotics to replace labour (work 24/7, no benefits required)). Unions have destroyed Canada, North America. Greenies will argue the environment argument, however China cares less about environment (although China has become cleaner than 30-40 years ago), China cares more about the productivity of it’s people. Therefore China will rise to the most powerful nation in the world (1.5 Billion chinese already). Over next decades Better learn Mandarin.......China will occur threats from India for superpowers. America will fall to third.

So you’re saying here in North America we should treat our workers like China does? Sweat shops, slave labour wages, no benefits, pensions or workplace protections of any kind? You first.
 

ABMax24

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
4,912
Reaction score
14,245
Location
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
If you want an example of bad energy policy here's one, Drax bought Pinnacle Renewables which produces wood pellets in BC and Alberta. The wood pellets from these mills will be shipped half way around the world to the Drax power station in England, which burns 10 million tons of wood pellets per year to generate electricity.

https://www.policynote.ca/burning-our-way/
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,529
Location
Alberta
If you want an example of bad energy policy here's one, Drax bought Pinnacle Renewables which produces wood pellets in BC and Alberta. The wood pellets from these mills will be shipped half way around the world to the Drax power station in England, which burns 10 million tons of wood pellets per year to generate electricity.

https://www.policynote.ca/burning-our-way/

It’s this kind of disingenuous slight of hand and selective fact manipulation that drives most people nuts and shows that often “green” initiatives are nothing of the kind.
 

ABMax24

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
4,912
Reaction score
14,245
Location
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
It’s this kind of disingenuous slight of hand and selective fact manipulation that drives most people nuts and shows that often “green” initiatives are nothing of the kind.

This one is pretty much a joke, I really can't find anyone in North America that is supportive of clear cutting forests to fuel a power station in Europe. Except of course those that directly profit from doing it.

I don't have an issue with people using wood or wood pellets to heat their homes, because 70-80% of that energy goes into useful heat for the house, and the consumption is only on the order of a handful of tons per household per year if heating exclusively with wood. Shipping wood pellets by the millions of tons half way around the world to burn in a 35-40% efficient thermal power plant makes no sense, especially when the remaining 60-65% of that heat is just vented out a cooling tower.
 

sethier

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
168
Reaction score
1,343
Location
unknown
13f3d28eaa3820159e5465a5f11703c0.jpg
 

Trashy

Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 16, 2008
Messages
132,833
Reaction score
105,509
Location
Fort Macleod
7 years ago today, Calgary had a snow storm and 7 years later, it's snowing hard right now!!

What was the title of this thread?
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,913
Reaction score
18,044
Location
Prince George
Justin Trudeau will be thrilled to learn they have a new crayon to add to their coloring collection, they should get a science award and millions in cash for this great achievement.
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
109,913
Reaction score
108,764
Location
Milo,Alberta
Justin Trudeau will be thrilled to learn they have a new crayon to add to their coloring collection, they should get a science award and millions in cash for this great achievement.
You mean for his toolbox. Funny how the left likes to use that word a lot lately. Another tool for our toolbox to fight blah blah blah...
 

jhurkot

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
4,346
Reaction score
17,617
Location
Monarch, AB
Dumbass John Kerry. Clip.

Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) Tweeted:
JOHN KERRY: “We need to get carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.”
https://t.co/DJRgXpwjRB

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1385276993319677953?s=20


How many people will die from air pollution in 2021?
How many people will die from air pollution in 2030?
How many people will die from air pollution in 2050?

If this number starts to increase exponentially, do you think that's a problem?
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,913
Reaction score
18,044
Location
Prince George
The WHO is starting to get a reputation for fear mongering, lying and altering stats. Something like our PM, and the we scandal.
 

AkNomad

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
1,550
Reaction score
1,795
Location
Alaska
So what is this really, global warming or global cooling because you can't have it both ways. :rollinglaugh:
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
109,913
Reaction score
108,764
Location
Milo,Alberta
Dumbass John Kerry. Clip.

Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) Tweeted:
JOHN KERRY: “We need to get carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.”
https://t.co/DJRgXpwjRB

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1385276993319677953?s=20
Trees and plant life ain't gonna like that. He actually said that America will be net zero emissions by 2050 then they need to get the CO2 out of the atmosphere. Thats a special kinda stupid there. When the US was at the height of the lockdown last winter/spring emissions were only 21% lower than emissions in 2005. Will people be able to even live in their basements when they go the next 29%? Will there be any industry, any cars at all, even electric? Typical left. Net zero is not good enough.
 

moyiesledhead

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5,473
Reaction score
10,955
Location
Moyie B.C.
How many people will die from air pollution in 2021?
How many people will die from air pollution in 2030?
How many people will die from air pollution in 2050?

If this number starts to increase exponentially, do you think that's a problem?

CO2 is not pollution. It's plant food. Eliminate it from the atmosphere like Kerry wants and we all die.
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,529
Location
Alberta
CO2 is not pollution. It's plant food. Eliminate it from the atmosphere like Kerry wants and we all die.

Exactly!! Trudeau and the rest of the liberal climate morons yap about “carbon pollution “. They’re too stupid to understand the difference between CO2 and actual chemical pollutants that are harmful to both people and the environment. Just shows how stupid the sheeple are that mindlessly repeat the talking points of the media and their masters....
 

bendy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2017
Messages
674
Reaction score
1,307
Location
Spirit River
Hiding and altering facts to suit an agenda is one thing, but when you start believing them it turns into priceless. Tim Ball from BC went to court and won exposing their scams. He has several videos out on what they have done and doing, it is all suppressed by the media as it does not fit the UN's agenda.

Just started into this post... and you my friend get it! "UN Agenda". 2030... 2030.
 
Top Bottom