Yep seems kinda nutty for sure , Just too bad that when it comes to the , save the planet/global warming/climate change issue, the majority of his comments about historical weather patterns and trends and cycles have been proven statistically true. A repeat of current cycles, except their was no,industrialized society to blame it on. Global alarmism is a huge industry, and the ones it benefits the most is certainly the grant funded “scientists” and probably almost as much , the media who always needs a global drama filled crisis. Read a thing the other day I agree with , a comment about Canadians. “ Why are Canadians such schmucks when it comes to this save the planet stuff ? Blessed with natural riches most countries envy , and instead of managing and utilizing these resources , we instead allow an idealist global viewpoint that minimizes the benefits to Canadians that , with proper management could Canada to flourish and prosper.
I’m not saying environment be damned, but I am saying that relative to the rest of the world , our footprint and pollution contribution is a friggen drop in the bucket. What we do or don’t do , is basically moot.
Global shmucks must be how we are looked at by so many around the world, especially America, nobody is benefitting from our stupidity more than them.
David ike isn't the only one that thinks it's a Scam.
I'm on that list as well.
but Justin is at the helm so what he says goes I guess.
must be nice flying around spending our money on beer and hand outs .
Funny with all the technology available in the world that these politicians have to all meet at one place. If these doofuses were actually serious about reducing THEIR carbon footprint they would be using video conferencing instead of burning jet fuel.
David ike isn't the only one that thinks it's a Scam.
I'm on that list as well.
but Justin is at the helm so what he says goes I guess.
must be nice flying around spending our money on beer and hand outs .
If science could irrefutably prove that it is real, would you change your mind?
If science could irrefutably prove that it is real, would you change your mind?
Many highly accredited people believe it has already been proven by statistical fact to be false. Why don"t you change your mind ?
Name a person I can research that would help me change my mind.
Sorry . not gonna get into a back and forth debate about whose climate expert is more credible. But first thing i always do is try to ascertain whether the "scientists " findings are in any way relevant to any future funding. Color me a cynic but guarantee of continued funding sometimes unfortunately may play a large part in published results.
Name a person I can research that would help me change my mind.