Fallen
Active VIP Member
That has been a rumor for 10 yrs, no truth to it at all.
Ya Thought so. I've heard it a few times in the last 2 years .
That has been a rumor for 10 yrs, no truth to it at all.
you guys all got raped on price jesus!!! fully loaded 2010 dmax new in 2010 0 km's full load minus dvd/navi $48000 yes thats rite $48000!!!! I traded a buddy my old toyo m/ts for a factory gm navi system so now it is full load for under $50,000. the key is buy the truck when the dealers put the programs on even then my truck had a $10,000 discount so i was still under $60,000 for a new dmax :d whoever said the chev front end is weak obviously hasnt driven a new dmax cause truly they are pretty tough I mean look at diesel power challenge who won oh yeah DMITRI MILLARD with what a chevy and what front end IFS i have dmitri as a buddy on FB his goal this year is 2000 rwhp on the dyno this year. and yes you can get the new chev 3500 in shortbox. The ultimate truck it all depends what your definition of the ultimate truck is if you want a towing monster that is super reliable and proven reliable then go cummins, if you want something that is fast for a year but is gonna blow up real soon after that then buy a ford, if u want a good all around comfy work truck that is capable of some serious power for cheap buy a dmax. dmax and cummins are the only way to go
Ford for me.I do not care for the "car like" ride of of the GM.Work at a Dodge
dealership and I see way too much at my level to own one.I also run gas engines due to the reliability issues I see with the latest diesels.Don,t be fooled people...Cummins engines are far from perfect.
please do explain more....
I work at a high volume Dodge dealer and replace 5-8 Cummins engines a month.The common rail 5.9L have injector problems that caused alot of engine failures.The 6.7L is actually having bottom end problems and broken camshaft gear pins.
I understand that the injectors failing do not have anything to do with the acctual structure of the engine,but Cummins has chosen to use the injectors.
The 6.7L has way too many issues with the DPF system,ecm calibration changes(once a month for awhile there),egr system,starter issues,charging system etc.
Cold air intake system also have been the cause of so many Cummins failures too.
so has everyone agreed on an answer to the question...
so what you are trying to say is because the connecting rod is bigger it must be stronger??? wow thats a good argument bigger is better hmmmm! and at what hp and toque rating does the dodge stock connecting rods fail at???? I know for a fact chev can get 750 rwhp out of a completely stock internal motor after that we need to add rods I also know for a fact that dodge and ford are good to about 50 psi before they absolutely need there headstuds and heads fire ringed were the chev can handle almost 65 psi without studs and no need to replace or fire ring the gaskets!!! last article i read the 5.9 was capable of about 550-600 rwhp before needing the rods done some guys have squeeked more than 650 out of them. so just because one is bigger in size doesnt mean it is better