wtf??? I can't find it at 23:25 on april 19th... Anyone else see the video???
Am i in the wrong spot?
I couldnt find it either wtfWTF??? I can't find it at 23:25 on April 19th... anyone else see the video???
Am I in the wrong spot?
Here's a direct Link...
Fast forward to about 22:45 for the start of the article.
note: the video would not play in Firefox for me, so use Internet explorer if you have issues
$1,000/hr X 10 helicopters = $10,000/hr X 50 hrs each = $500,000.
So 10 helicopters flew for a week straight just removing sleds?
WTF??? I can't find it at 23:25 on April 19th... anyone else see the video???
Am I in the wrong spot?
Just guessing, but maybe they billed for lost income as well, as the report did say that they had to turn away heli-ski customers in order to aid in the rescue... Regardless, that's a lot of money.
Just guessing, but maybe they billed for lost income as well, as the report did say that they had to turn away heli-ski customers in order to aid in the rescue... Regardless, that's a lot of money.
I feel that the rescue mission should be covered by the governement thats forsure but for the sled recovery the owners of there own sleds should have to pay there share for it. if you blow your motor in the back and need a heli you gotta pay for it. But the rescue mission and the hours for looking for more buried people should be on the government
I don't understand why they didn't contract this job out to a bidder. It's just another stupid financial blunder that a typical government always does. Get the job done in the most inefficient manner....
It's not if anyone's life was in danger anymore, so what's the big rush getting the sleds "rescued"?
So why did we need a Bell 212, or 205 there? Because they are in for the cash grab.
Wiegele Did a rescue in Blue river last year and charged something ridiculous like 15 grande.