Oh boy I tried to say the same thing yesterday and got shut down them doo guys just don't listen. I wish someone had a track Dyno to compare the two as well. Again we shall not speak of the power delivery system between the two. Might be a bad topic as well. Lol
So smaller seat, holes in flap, less material in boards, and less rod length in track. Should equal less weight. So how heavy is that new skid. If the extra weight is in the skid I see why they went with the flex track to help tip that thing over with so much weight lower on the sled.
I try and learn what I can from all the brands. I do not feel threaten just like stirring the pot. Who likes a boring forum anyways. Serious note though would you say the powdermax is better then the CE?
Seriously though I wonder why 4 degrees tilt? Hardly seems worth all the enginering. I wonder if campo last will look at this flex track idea and build others.
Sorry I did not mean to hit the like button. Anyways oh maxwell you can make fun of all the other brands get people pissed off at you and now we try and have a little fun with you and you get like this. Grow up man. We're all having fun. Anyways I guess the only big release this year was less...
I'm having a hard time with your math on power to weight ratio. Dyno port lists go numbers for xp at 163.9. Numbers for pro 154. So doo claims about the same weight so 459 for 154 track size. Polaris 417 for 155 track. 459/163.9 equals 2.80 lb/hp. Skidoo417/154 equals 2.70 lb/hp. Polaris. This...
Well it is sort of a fail for over a year we have been hearing about a game changer from doo and we got as you say just a Polaris release gimmicks. And as doo has stated the weights are about the SAME. As doo has done in history added weight so we will see Monday as specs will be released. So...