Yanking around a 40' toy hauler, with gas engine

the_real_wild1

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
6,966
Reaction score
7,389
Location
cardiff
There will be no handling issues between a diesel and gas except for the ride. Diesel will usually ride nicer in a one ton. My dodge had the same suspension as the diesel. Rode like crap because of it. The trailer has brakes for a reason. If you are depending on your truck brakes to stop a big trailer then you need to reevaluate being on the road imo. Hauling a bigger toyhauler with a gas truck will suck after towing the same trailer with a new diesel. If the diesel was early 90's then a new gas job will keep up.
 

ducati

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
755
Reaction score
1,714
Location
Calgary
Brakes and chassis are the same between a Diesel and Gas unit and only change once you step up to a DRW. For stopping the big difference between Gas and Diesel is the exhaust brake which is really good on the newer units. Personally i pull a 42ft triple axle toy hauler and some big loads of hay and wouldn't trade my dually for a SRW or Cummins for a Hemi. That's just my opinion.
 

teeroy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,155
Reaction score
14,453
Location
Roma, Alberta
Got told at work the other day I am not to use the word "retard" I have to use "Limited" instead, still works though "That Guy is fawking limited".
a buddy that owns a fairly large company told me that in their last round of training they were told you cannot call someone an idiot or a retard, but it's okay for you to ask them if they have such afflictions.

so instead of "Hey! you fawking retard!" now they have to say "hey! are you fawking retarded?"
 

skegpro

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
9,930
Reaction score
21,329
Location
In them hills.
Why are people concerned about stopping with a gas 1ton over a diesel 1ton? Wouldn't all 1tons have the same brakes? If anything a gas might stop a bit better it's a lighter motor. As for pulling it will pull it as long as the truck is rated for the trailer weight.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exhaust breaking on the new diesels is awesome, don't even touch the breaks driving to Revelstoke pulling the 26ft enclosed.
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,005
Location
Leduc Alberta
Yah never thought about the the exhaust brake, the are very nice. That's one thing I wish my old cummins had!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
112,598
Reaction score
86,666
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
Well young fellow, with my 36' four season holiday trailer and one pull out, I make it with a 6.2l gas job. It isn't easy and sometimes, pulling some of the hills, I'm down into 3rd or 2nd gear. The Coq is a slow drive up! Not bad coming down as the click shifter works great for down shifting using the transmission for braking most of the time.

I have seen 42l/100km on the cheater meter and on our trip to South Dakota the average was 30l/100km.
 

Caper11

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,644
Reaction score
18,955
Location
Edson,Alberta
42l/100km !

That's a lot of extra stress to the drivetrain and the driver.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

freeflorider

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
2,822
Reaction score
8,858
Location
West koots
Well young fellow, with my 36' four season holiday trailer and one pull out, I make it with a 6.2l gas job. It isn't easy and sometimes, pulling some of the hills, I'm down into 3rd or 2nd gear. The Coq is a slow drive up! Not bad coming down as the click shifter works great for down shifting using the transmission for braking most of the time.

I have seen 42l/100km on the cheater meter and on our trip to South Dakota the average was 30l/100km.

Not to shabby for a gas pot, I pulled my 37' triple slide behind my 11 f350 srw down the coast line to California and was 24.7 per 100. I am happy with that and pulled it like a dream, hills were no problem.
this being said when you compare costs of ownership ie: oil changes, Repairs, tires due to torque load etc. besides the lack of power to pull the hills I'm not sure, for a 5liter per Hun diffrance I guess it comes down to your $$$ situation and how fast you want to pull the hills.
i have a bunch of one tons gas and diesel, still have a hard time balancing what is best, gas is cheaper to run but dam that diesel power is nice.
 

the_real_wild1

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
6,966
Reaction score
7,389
Location
cardiff
As a daily driver my diesel is cheaper to run then the 6.4 hemi I had. Towing is even more so. I also drive 40km each way to work mostly at highway speeds so you have to factor that in. If I only drove 5-10 km then it would be tough on the engine
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
112,598
Reaction score
86,666
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
42l/100km !

That's a lot of extra stress to the drivetrain and the driver.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes it was. Different driving conditions make huge differences with a gas motor. Not so much with a diesel. Head winds and long steep pulls in the mountains are not the best. I can go to Castlegar a lot easier and cheaper through Crawford Bay than I can up and over the Creston-Salmo pass, etc. Oh ya', I don't burn any gas for a few clicks while on the ferry!
 

pistoncontracting

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,842
Location
On the edge
I have seen 42l/100km on the cheater meter and on our trip to South Dakota the average was 30l/100km.

Wow, that's not to bad. Our '15 f350 dually, with 4:33 gears and 35's averages around 20l/100 just driving down the highway, averaging 110 to 120 km/hr.
Pulling a 40' Raptor at the same speeds, we average around 36l/100kms. I know a gas engine wouldn't be able to maintain that speed- but I'm sure I have a problem with that.

I likeely would though if I was forced into doing it :)

My '11 f350 had 3:32 gears, and 37" tires. I never pulled the toyhauler with it, but did take a FWA 4255 JDw/loader on a gooseneck up to Edmonton. I averaged 52L/100 on that trip- but had no issue with the cruise on at 120km/hr...:cool:


First world problems....
 

the_real_wild1

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
6,966
Reaction score
7,389
Location
cardiff
Wow, that's not to bad. Our '15 f350 dually, with 4:33 gears and 35's averages around 20l/100 just driving down the highway, averaging 110 to 120 km/hr.
Pulling a 40' Raptor at the same speeds, we average around 36l/100kms. I know a gas engine wouldn't be able to maintain that speed- but I'm sure I have a problem with that.

I likeely would though if I was forced into doing it :)

My '11 f350 had 3:32 gears, and 37" tires. I never pulled the toyhauler with it, but did take a FWA 4255 JDw/loader on a gooseneck up to Edmonton. I averaged 52L/100 on that trip- but had no issue with the cruise on at 120km/hr...:cool:


First world problems....
I think if you are getting that kind of mileage you need a new truck. Chev or Dodge perhaps?? Pulling my 5th wheel I am getting 24l/100km on the flats. It goes up on a hill but that mileage your getting something sounds wrong.
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
112,598
Reaction score
86,666
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
Wow, that's not to bad. Our '15 f350 dually, with 4:33 gears and 35's averages around 20l/100 just driving down the highway, averaging 110 to 120 km/hr.
Pulling a 40' Raptor at the same speeds, we average around 36l/100kms. I know a gas engine wouldn't be able to maintain that speed- but I'm sure I have a problem with that.

I likeely would though if I was forced into doing it :)

My '11 f350 had 3:32 gears, and 37" tires. I never pulled the toyhauler with it, but did take a FWA 4255 JDw/loader on a gooseneck up to Edmonton. I averaged 52L/100 on that trip- but had no issue with the cruise on at 120km/hr...:cool:


First world problems....

With my sled(s), I'm around the 18-19l/100 km. Empty in the summer going down hill or a good tail wind going to Lethbridge, I can see numbers below 16l/100 km and some days it has been as low as 14l/100km. But that is empty!

I have the 373 gearing. Had no choice as this truck was the only one available and had to have it shipped from Prince George.
 

Culvert

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
1,040
Reaction score
251
Location
Cold Lake, Alberta
Ferniesnow.... what kind of miles you have on your truck now? I have a 16 F350 6.2L 3.73 gears. with 23K on her & my average since new is 21L/100. Best I seen was 18 when diving through BC last summer. would like to see better numbers, but bought for reliability & cheaper maintenance costs then what my diesel was.
 

Ronaha

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
3,038
Location
Narnia
I pull with a 8.1 liter and love it....but I wouldn't want a 40' or 42' for where we go....one time after it rained all weekend it took 4 trucks tied together to pull a 42 footer out.
 

rzrgade

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
7,580
Reaction score
14,760
Location
West of Toronto
Yes I have no issues with my hemi .. But in short , if I had a larger / heavier trailer or pulled the mountains more often , I would go diesel...
Now I burn a bit more fuel & am usually a half beer behind after set up ...,
Hahaha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,005
Location
Leduc Alberta
Yes I have no issues with my hemi .. But in short , if I had a larger / heavier trailer or pulled the mountains more often , I would go diesel...
Now I burn a bit more fuel & am usually a half beer behind after set up ...,
Hahaha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You drink to slow!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom