maxwell
Active VIP Member
Probably doesn’t change anything for us but looks like they are selling the entire operation
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Last edited:
may be worse with a bigger cooperation and more money backing it....
I think they pay a per guest cost to the government for the use of the land.What does an operation like that pay in tenure costs to the British Columbia government?
In other words when I looked into a trip the price seemed out of line with what a helicopter charter and a room ought to cost and the rest was a bribe to the officials to prevent us from snowmobiling in that area.
That sounds like something Kermit could have done.I think they pay a per guest cost to the government for the use of the land.
The cost of a heli holiday is expensive, but you forgot the factor in cost of a guide, first class food and being in a remote location.
Was talking with a buddy who works for CMH last night and one guest spent 3.4 million last year with them and that was just heli time, not including booze and lodging.
He is over 70 and has racked up over a million vertical feet in all the years he has been a customer.
I don't know how recreation tenure works but I have been involved in other tenure types and it is typically an annual rent fee that is fairly small compared to the value gained by the tenure. Ie. there was a tenure that was sold for $60M and annual rent on it was under $200k/year.What does an operation like that pay in tenure costs to the British Columbia government?
In other words when I looked into a trip the price seemed out of line with what a helicopter charter and a room ought to cost and the rest was a bribe to the officials to prevent us from snowmobiling in that area.
I don’t care how much money a single customer spent, doesn’t mean it’s right that one business and one activity should be able to dictate the use of an entire area.I think they pay a per guest cost to the government for the use of the land.
The cost of a heli holiday is expensive, but you forgot the factor in cost of a guide, first class food and being in a remote location.
Was talking with a buddy who works for CMH last night and one guest spent 3.4 million last year with them and that was just heli time, not including booze and lodging.
He is over 70 and has racked up over a million vertical feet in all the years he has been a customer.
I don’t care how much money a single customer spent, doesn’t mean it’s right that one business and one activity should be able to dictate the use of an entire area.
This is elitism at its peak… and reeks of a long flawed and corrupt system.
Unless the area is designated as non motorized there is nothing stopping sledders from using the area also. Tenure only restricts other businesses from using the area and generating revenue off it.
I don't like heli ops keeping me out of areas either but there is lots of terrain in BC to explore and I respect their operations. In my area they shut down in March so we ride their tenures then.
Not fully true, some tenures do grant their holders exclusive rights to an area. Its not the norm but they are out there and its up to us to know.Unless the area is designated as non motorized there is nothing stopping sledders from using the area also. Tenure only restricts other businesses from using the area and generating revenue off it.
I don't like heli ops keeping me out of areas either but there is lots of terrain in BC to explore and I respect their operations. In my area they shut down in March so we ride their tenures then.
They tried to decapitate you with the rotor blades? That’s a lawsuit waiting to happen!Not fully true, some tenures do grant their holders exclusive rights to an area. Its not the norm but they are out there and its up to us to know.
Almost never believe anything a tenure holder a tells you (I'm not broad stroking them all bad but the bad ones know who they are). They will post signs with inaccurate or misleading information (usually a "closure" notice) in an attempt to keep all other users out of that area.
If you think Wiggles will be better under a bigger name you better think again. Its a constant struggle with this parent company moving signs or incorrectly signing areas to expand territory. They've tried to kick us out of open areas after the tenure expired. I also have no issues with other user groups or sharing terrain and will wait until the closures are over - theres lots of open stuff to hit. Treat me with respect and I will treat you with respect. Try to land on top of my sled and cut my head off again and you're going to find out what happens when a helmet is thrown into your rotor blades.
Chatter is a great example of how both groups can co-exist. However, lots of these other operators are out there for the sole purpose of profiteering from total domination of the landscape and they will stop at nothing to keep you out.
Last time I knew it was 2 whole dollars per day per client plus an annual fee. Sled tour companies were paying 10 per client day.What does an operation like that pay in tenure costs to the British Columbia government?
In other words when I looked into a trip the price seemed out of line with what a helicopter charter and a room ought to cost and the rest was a bribe to the officials to prevent us from snowmobiling in that area.