- Thread starter
- #41
byronkentgraham
Active VIP Member
Jesus where is Imdooin when you need him? Lmao!!
Hes in the garage trying to add another piston on the king quad so he can keep up.
Jesus where is Imdooin when you need him? Lmao!!
Correct me if I'm wrong... but I don't think they were ever thinking of banning guns all together... just ban the assault/military type guns...and the hand guns??Absolutely. I'm 100% for proper licensing as long as its not overly difficult to get like Australian laws., it's the removal im against.
Correct me if I'm wrong... but I don't think they were ever thinking of banning guns all together... just ban the assault/military type guns...and the hand guns??
Correct me if I'm wrong... but I don't think they were ever thinking of banning guns all together... just ban the assault/military type guns...and the hand guns??
So their wonderful leader proposed an assault weapon and high capacity magazine ban today. Guess the second amendment is allowed to be tossed aside when the president is a democrat.
Glad Canada is moving to give gun owners their rights back.
if they take that second ammendant 1874 crap and burn it, why should some laws over 100 years old dictate how they live lives today, back then their best gun could not kill more than a few shots before jamming
obama should of hamered more on hand guns as well, way to easy to buy them legal or not
second thought, give them 20 years and their poulation will be in a decline shooting one another...
Will the govenment ever attack it's own people. Probably not. Actually 99% chance of not. If that 1% ever happens I will be prepared, whether the government likes it or not.
If you can sleep well at night knowing you have no way to protect your family, go ahead. Do not try to take away my right to.
Just out of curiosity. What do you think you need to protect your family? You live in Canada, a country that does not allow handguns or assault rifles without a proper permit. So, why are you so against the US following suit to help protect its people from themselves?
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2
Just out of curiosity. What do you think you need to protect your family? You live in Canada, a country that does not allow handguns or assault rifles without a proper permit. So, why are you so against the US following suit to help protect its people from themselves?
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2
Because anything the states does Canada seems to follow suit. Auto rifles are banned here 100% already and I think that's ridiculous.
I have 1 bolt action .30-06, .22LR semiauto, 7.62mmx39 semiauto and a 12 gauge pump shotgun with a long barrel.
None of my current guns were bought for home protection but in a pinch they can serve as home protection.
im not sure where you are coming from but how the heck can you stand there and say that giving a gun to every gang banger.. hillybilly let the south rise again ... psycho serial killer is a good idea ...in a civil, developed country guns have to be controled ...we in north america dont have to worry about protecting our selfes from the governement because there is no chance our system would ever allow it. we have more then one person who needs to insert their thumb to let a nuke go or whatever ... so your arguments are basically useless ... i love hunting and i believe guns should be used for those purposes but any gun built for a purpose other then than that should be destroyed or impossible for public apprehention .... the states have over 10000 deaths a year related to hand guns thats over 1 person per 30000 people killed ...anyways if they dont do something then the mass shootings will continue more and more frequently till the only way you will protect your family is by locking them in your house cuz your to scared to step outside
imagine the look on peoples faces if you showed up at one of the riding areas in the west country and unloaded a tank
Us Polaris riders see that face everyday..............Yawn........
Protection. If they are going to sell kevlar vests should i not be allowed to have a round to protect myself?
To be honest I don't agree with AP shells in civilian hands, but I don't like the idea of banning and restricting firearms.
It's proven that in places where firearms are more restricted violent crime goes up.
AP shells will go through body armor but it does very little damage. Hollow points do a lot more damage, but won't go through body armor.
sorry bud, u don't need one unless ya live in the good ol usa.