The bridge.

luvz da mud

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
1,102
Location
E-town
The weight of the girders will be transferred to the crane so that workers can inspect the steel beams, and begin repairing or removing them.
Just bend them back? If that's the city's thinking it's no wounder they failed in the first place
 

gates559

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 31, 2013
Messages
750
Reaction score
900
Location
G.P Alberta
Caused by stupidity, You see China had a high demand for our metal so We sent them our junk cars and pop cans. and then they recycled the cars back into metal and sold the chit metal back to us, resulting in these faulty beams. We should not give our resources away and pay more to get them back as an inferior product.

I could be off, it may have also been caused by someone saving a few bucks and making more profit. Perhaps inexperienced workers or inferior product.

Also could have been a "conspiracy" designed to fail to help stimulate the economy, provide jobs during the recession.
 

arff

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
141,810
Reaction score
56,059
Location
Leduc
Well I have about 7 broken Polaris axles from the last 5 year's and a can of glue.


I will go fix the bridge tomorrow.


It will be lighter...
 

woody_tobius_jr

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
1,430
Location
Morinville, AB
truckers!!!!



turned corner to sharp

Easy now, we were the ones hauling the bridge beams to site, how do you expect something that long to stay straight going down Groat Road.??....
Maxwell has the best explanation so far. Wind wasn't the issue.


Sent from my iPad
 

52weekbreak

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
4,058
Location
SPAB
Contractor allowed only a very limited time to close Groat Road so time counts. They have to set the beams in place and provide some cross bracing and begin next lift. Other crews are following installing cross bracing which takes longer than the lift and placement. Bracing falls behind but due to time limitations, the lift goes on.

An unforecast microburst apparently hit very late Sunday night and the combination of wind load and lack of cross bracing caused the flex. Once the bend started, the weight of the girders carried over further.

Not quite as sciency as T-Team and not as in depth as Maxwell but that is what apparently happened. The engineers should have an official report within the week. I guess we'll see then.

Graham does lots of bridges but you don't see too many with this deep an I beam. They look to be about 8 feet tall and the top and bottom flanges are only about 16 inches wide.
 

sledneck_03

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,571
Location
saskatoon
how so?

Girder installations are serious business and supreme is the best at it. ( girder supply and erection is typically a one contract item). from the limited details i have and a few photos my conclusion is as follows. This bridge is a single span bridge with 3 girder sections. east west and centre. This means there are no piers for the girders to cantilever and the east and west sections must be temporarily supported past the centre of gravity and chained down at the abutment ends. followed by complete cross brace installation on those completed sections before the centre girders are installed and cross braced. the girders that twisted are in the center section. Steel girders are extremely flimsy in torsion and are designed for only downward force. only when the entire girder structure is cross braced and the concrete deck is cast onto the girders does it become full strength in torsion (earthquake), side load (wind) and down force (vehcles). as girders are installed a team follows quickly behind and installs cross bracing but does not torque all bolts until complete. my "guess" is that the weight of the centre girder sections installed combined with warmer temperatures caused the temporary shoring to sink. This could even be by as little as 20mm to cause this. from the photos you can see the cross bracing team was not able to completely cross brace the damaged section before this occurred. if the shoring did in fact sink this would put extreme amounts of compression on top of the girder and tension on the bottom of the girder causing it to buckle. had they been able to fully cross brace the centre in time this likely would not have happened but it still could have due to the amount of force. In my opinion this is not a matter of poor quality steel ( this is checked and double checked before fabrication and shipping). it is also in my opinion not a fault of the installation crew but more an oversight into the temporary shoring systems in place. i would like to think i am wrong and it was something else because typically all things are considered such as temperature while the contractor and engineer are developing and approving a girder erection plan. I also have a hard time thinking this is a design flaw in the girders for 2 reasons. #1 the girders sitting with no concrete deck or traffic have less than 20% of their design load on them and i dont think they could have fawked that up that bad. #2 the computer software used to design girders is mind blowing. they run them through dynamic and static load tests, wind, earthquake etcetc tests before they are fabricated.

Just my 2c

torsional buckling, should have been braced like the ones on the left prior to disconnecting the cranes.
 

sledneck_03

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,571
Location
saskatoon
Sure but that's not the crane operators fault lol

depends. If there was a engineered lift drawing set that wasnt followed its the on site supervisors/project managers fault. if the engineered lift drawing set or stamped bridge drawing set didnt specify then its the engineering companies fault.

i do engineered lift drawing sets all the time. Lots of times the scope is just for lifting, so we attach lugs of swivel hoist rings and demonstrate how to lift it and where and loads the cranes will see but there will be a note unless it was in the scope for the owner to ensure structure is capable of withstanding loads stated in drawing set. Just because the lugs wont rip off doesnt mean it wont fold in half........
 

pfi572

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
15,264
Location
Grande Prairie
Why doesn't Graham or the engineers join S&M and get this chit figgered out??
Lol
They could just pm maxi pad and problem solved .
Jeesh
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom