That sled sounds pathetic, definitely not the particular sled to have.
Hey Maxwell, this is a perfect example of how much G4 wheelies affect climbing ability. Classic case rt there. The track is only on the rear, a little bit, and the skis are 3 ft in the air. Ewww. No traction, just spin, no momentum. Dude has to let off to control the sled. G4 sucks but most of the sleds are Doo, therefore they are the best. Doo owners are so dum. I own a doo. Hmmmmm.
If you wheelie in the climb you are missing the boat. LMFAO!!!
Maxwell says it is.
Thats a good example of a poorly setup sled, the 850 doo is a good sled, and even better when setup properly.
It’s like you guys have never tightened a limiter strap in your life. The manufacturer puts holes in there for a reason.
Doo needs a new chassis big time. Less weight/narrower boards/different suspension/actual hood vents to keep the engine bay below 300f/floating secondary/get rid of brake rotor housing and chaincase in footwells. the list go on. Drive a cat or poo and you see how fast the doo is a distant 3rd in chassis. Turbo smurbo crap chassis
Max and the Minions are gonna make you pay for putting that out there.
That sled doesn’t sound right and you can hear the RPM fading hard coming in and out of load. Sum ting Wong
Nothing to do with the chassis I could pull that hill on my 154 2.5”
What can i say, some guys purchase a Doo and because they spent their hard earned money on it, its the best thing ever. Then theres the guys that actually ride them all and know the difference. The SKIDOO chassis must get way lighter without a doubt but at the end of the day Yamaha Turbo Power is king. Weight is the only thing Doo chassis has on it. The rest of the Doo chassis is just plain wrong. Running boards included. The clutching and engineering is a train Wreck, But its kind of hard to look away because guys keep buying Doos and thats entertaining.
No one that starts riding in the mountains ever buys a Second Doo. If you do its only because you just LOVE them, no other reason, because its certainly not a performance driven decision LOL. Hey i get it, i like my GMCs too, they aren't a powerful truck but theyve treated my mechanic well.
What can i say, some guys purchase a sled and because they spent their hard earned money on it, its the best thing ever. Then theres the guys that actually ride them all and know the difference. The SKIDOO chassis could get lighter without a doubt but at the end of the day Power is king. Weight is the only thing polaris chassis has on it. The rest of the Polaris chassis is just plain wrong. Running boards included. The engineering is a train Wreck, But its kind of hard to look away because guys keep buying them and thats entertaining.
No one that starts riding in the mountains ever buys a Second Polaris. If you do its only because you just LOVE them, no other reason, because its certainly not a performance driven decision LOL. Hey i get it, i like my GMCs too, they arent the lightest truck but theyve treated me well.
The N/A Polaris 840 has more HP than the N/A Doo by a couple. The Doo however does feel like it has a bit more torque. So if power is king, come on over. Or you will all need to spend $25k for a turbo Doo if you want it with 4 years warranty. Everything else just plain works better on the Polaris for extreme riding. But let's say you want the T850 for 4 years. Do you really think by then it's going to match performance of the 2024 sleds? and what will it be worth as soon as anything with more power is released? It might not be Polaris that ups the game, it might be BRP with the next chassis with more power.
The real question is: Would the T850 have made that impossible climb or would it have wheelied over?
Sorry were talking about mountain sleds here. what is the N/A you speak of? i think thats old technology and irrelevant now. Considering we ride at elevation i think we can only compare compensated machines.
N/A sleds are great around the farm
LMAO