Humorous picture thread

catalac

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
13,116
Location
Red Deer
1688347150253.png
 

Couch

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
687
Reaction score
1,225
Location
Nl
I think its meant to be more as an aid rather than primary source of propulsion.

If ship's travel at (just a guess) 20 knots and there is sufficient wind to overcome that, if a sail capable of 2 knots on those big ships, the engines would only require the energy for 18 knots and let the sail do the rest where appropriate. Could be a huge fuel savings.

I'm a naval architect by trade, own and operate boats, family has lengthy maritime history ....Horizon Arctic - offshore support that just located the Titan sub - is currently docked in front of my house loading chain. ;)
There's a couple of routes - one way - where winds are consistent enough to maybe offset / assist propulsion to a small degree but it's mostly window dressing. You'll need vessels dedicated to those routes only which become costly too. Reducing emissions in marine is a much more difficult matter mostly because it's currently the most cost effective/ efficient way to move goods - far cheaper than truck or rail - on a manageable time frame. Delays are expensive and have a knock on effect in cargo facilities.
One of the biggest hurdles for marine is that there's no great regenerative opportunities...takes power to start moving and takes power to slow / stop unlike wheeled road vehicles or trains.
Most likely ship ops will continue to be conventional power for quite a while with more elaborate exhaust scrubbers and cleaner fuel requirements with a whole lot of gimmicks on the side. Wing spars being most probable candidate.
Better antifouling and "slippery" bottom coating advancements will likely contribute the most gains.


Sent from my motorola edge plus using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom