Kenny. I put a T3 174 in my 18 G4. Big drivers
and what problem is that?
The sled handles well has good power and flat out works. Low approach angles have their own problems. probably outweigh the problems of a higher attack angle..
and what problem is that?
The sled handles well has good power and flat out works. Low approach angles have their own problems. probably outweigh the problems of a higher attack angle..
Only drawback is usually the drivers are lower and subject to hitting more rocks/stumps ....ending your day.What problems are there with a gentle approach angle?
Only drawback is usually the drivers are lower and subject to hitting more rocks/stumps ....ending your day.
What problems are there with a gentle approach angle?
Eat sheet Dikwell. That's incorrect information. Cats approach angle is the lowest of all sleds and it absolutely annihilates any size track 850 Doo. Not good for technical? Fk your dumb.
How's the ski pressure on that useless 850 154 you bought?rotflmao
WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR
Relax its called..............jealousy
ski pressure. Not good for technical riding. fantastic for climbing. but you knew that lol
You will be amazed how well the cat sidehills.Aside from your guys little war does the steeper angle not make initiating side hill or turns easier?
You will plough more and trench more on takeoff but forces track to dig deeper keeping you into the hill deeper.
Shallow attach angle will just require you to position feet a bit further back and a couple air shock adjustments.
Weight boards a bit further back to help the shallow angle dig in.
The shallow angle should have a wee advantage other areas.
Carry on with the G4 war.
lol
You will be amazed how well the cat sidehills.
Doesn't wash out at all.
Has any one tried a 850 with a 2.5 track?
Wht would you !!!!Has any one tried a 850 with a 2.5 track?
That's what I thought but what I said in my mind was much much meaner. It rhymed with dumb cluck.Wht would you !!!!
Wht would you !!!!