fredw
Active VIP Member
Swamped with a buddy this last week for a few hrs on his 165 850 with 200km in it:d:d.. I handed the 174 t3 to him with bakers skid and impulse.. Yes I know it not that fare.
i might have have came into it with more anticipation, than I should have, but after a few seconds I guess I was a little let down.. Throttle response was ok, but first thoughts were it was not a responsive as the older 880 ptec was.. Seamed to come out of snow ok, but could quickly feel where 174 had more bite to the snow..
almost could not beleve how erratic or loose the sled felt.. Like you could flick it effortlessly, this to me was its biggest downside, we were running threw trees in decent untouch snow with a base a few feet under and the sled felt to me like it was on ice.. Where you were constantly over steering, this flick able sled was darting back and forth and ended up taking much more control than what I wanted to give it for me to stay in control
then in the steep with track speed max, and ground speed slowing, there just was no way you could properly control it, the skid is almost a joke for this sled, since feedback from it is constantly the main control of how one has to drive it..
In in the steep with skis two feet in the air and one trying to side hill with balence control and throttle is so different than what the older t3 174 and bakers skid has to offer, where you feel ten times more stable..
talking with racers edge, Darrel was telling me where guys have got rid of there G4 over this very problem and went back to the t3, I can now understand why.. I see why he has sold more skids this year than ever to first year flagship sleds.. And why guys are upset after spending 16k on a purpose built sled, and then need to buy another skid, thus the other problems with belts, and bulkheads.. Are these sleds being proper tested before release?.
also felt like running boards were a bit narrow, or more narrow than I had wanted them to be near the front..
Latter in in the day we found a few good steep and deep spots in the trees and were able to see how sleds compared and once again the G4 even with limiter strap sucked up, was just right out of control darting where others went strait threw the woops and up.. Even the Poo had the edge there
think first and and formost a proper skid is needed, doo missed the boat again with this old junk they have in there now... With driver on seat rear skid sunk four inches.. They need to put a decent skid like baker sells and not look back.. Save so many other problems for them.. And all the extra money and frustration for there customers.. And other than that sled felt ok, power was ok,, track options for next year I hope has a longer option, the 165 is to short in the deep and would help in handling, and stability
Not even sure if they will have this corrected enough by 18 to have me buy..
All the the excitment of the new power plant, It was sucked out after a few hrs..
i might have have came into it with more anticipation, than I should have, but after a few seconds I guess I was a little let down.. Throttle response was ok, but first thoughts were it was not a responsive as the older 880 ptec was.. Seamed to come out of snow ok, but could quickly feel where 174 had more bite to the snow..
almost could not beleve how erratic or loose the sled felt.. Like you could flick it effortlessly, this to me was its biggest downside, we were running threw trees in decent untouch snow with a base a few feet under and the sled felt to me like it was on ice.. Where you were constantly over steering, this flick able sled was darting back and forth and ended up taking much more control than what I wanted to give it for me to stay in control
then in the steep with track speed max, and ground speed slowing, there just was no way you could properly control it, the skid is almost a joke for this sled, since feedback from it is constantly the main control of how one has to drive it..
In in the steep with skis two feet in the air and one trying to side hill with balence control and throttle is so different than what the older t3 174 and bakers skid has to offer, where you feel ten times more stable..
talking with racers edge, Darrel was telling me where guys have got rid of there G4 over this very problem and went back to the t3, I can now understand why.. I see why he has sold more skids this year than ever to first year flagship sleds.. And why guys are upset after spending 16k on a purpose built sled, and then need to buy another skid, thus the other problems with belts, and bulkheads.. Are these sleds being proper tested before release?.
also felt like running boards were a bit narrow, or more narrow than I had wanted them to be near the front..
Latter in in the day we found a few good steep and deep spots in the trees and were able to see how sleds compared and once again the G4 even with limiter strap sucked up, was just right out of control darting where others went strait threw the woops and up.. Even the Poo had the edge there
think first and and formost a proper skid is needed, doo missed the boat again with this old junk they have in there now... With driver on seat rear skid sunk four inches.. They need to put a decent skid like baker sells and not look back.. Save so many other problems for them.. And all the extra money and frustration for there customers.. And other than that sled felt ok, power was ok,, track options for next year I hope has a longer option, the 165 is to short in the deep and would help in handling, and stability
Not even sure if they will have this corrected enough by 18 to have me buy..
All the the excitment of the new power plant, It was sucked out after a few hrs..