Economy/Recession

eclipse1966

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
4,599
Reaction score
7,824
Location
Armstrong BC
based on that, Norway produces less oil than we do (I believe 1/2 of that). They are sitting on almost a trillion dollars of a fund. Quebec has received equalization payments since the mid '50 of over 200 billion which comes not only from AB but all provinces. Even if it came all from AB we should have just under 800 billion left over.


Wonder if Norway had to transfer vast sums of its wealth to other regions ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
20,674
Location
Salmon Arm
based on that, Norway produces less oil than we do (I believe 1/2 of that). They are sitting on almost a trillion dollars of a fund. Quebec has received equalization payments since the mid '50 of over 200 billion which comes not only from AB but all provinces. Even if it came all from AB we should have just under 800 billion left over.
Oil in Norway is far more lucrative than in AB. Oil sands are some of the most expensive and energy intensive extraction around. Deep sea is no cake walk but sweet crude is still much preferred.
 

eclipse1966

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
4,599
Reaction score
7,824
Location
Armstrong BC
agreed but still we have a HUGE gap in money stashed away in a fund compared to Norway.

Oil in Norway is far more lucrative than in AB. Oil sands are some of the most expensive and energy intensive extraction around. Deep sea is no cake walk but sweet crude is still much preferred.
 

eclipse1966

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
4,599
Reaction score
7,824
Location
Armstrong BC
that would be awesome to receive money from the government for once instead of paying them. They also have free education and day care as well. That is a huge benefit to the people.

If norway split their oil pot of $905,000,000,000 between their population of 5.1billion, each citizen would receive $177,451 each.... Nice :)
 

SamStorm

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
214
Reaction score
900
Location
Alberta
Alberta oil is also landlocked. No way to get to market so its also priced at a discount. Norway has access to the ocean so shipping is no problem for them.
Maybe if we could get a pipeline built the price for Alberta oil will go up some.
 

adamg

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
3,468
Reaction score
4,675
Location
S'toon,SK
Alberta oil is also landlocked. No way to get to market so its also priced at a discount. Norway has access to the ocean so shipping is no problem for them.
Maybe if we could get a pipeline built the price for Alberta oil will go up some.

Good luck with that. Literally every province and state is against you, as best I can tell.
 

smokinD

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
19,360
Location
Freedom, Ab
that would be awesome to receive money from the government for once instead of paying them. They also have free education and day care as well. That is a huge benefit to the people.

They have that free chit in Quebec also lol!!
 

1901306708

Active member
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
105
Reaction score
203
Location
edmonton
The secret to prospering in alberta is to have a long memory

we have every advantage. notley et al are not helping, but we had a real good run. and another will come sooner or later. dont blow the next one too.
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,529
Location
Alberta
Oil in Norway is far more lucrative than in AB. Oil sands are some of the most expensive and energy intensive extraction around. Deep sea is no cake walk but sweet crude is still much preferred.

Id say it's probably close to beng a wash as far as production costs go. I worked in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea for almost two years on semi-sub rigs and can tell you that production costs per hole there are extremely high. The quality of their oil is better and is easier to sell, but they don't get the amount or variance of by-products that Alberta has, eg NGL's, gas, sulphur etc. These all add value to bottom line. Remember that there's much more to Alberta than just the oil sands.

Where the Norwegians are better off is that there's no competing interests within the country that stifle resource development and provinces that demand money unreasonably (Quebec). They also don't have regions in the country that are deliberately kept poor for political reasons (maritimes) thus requiring financial transfers to keep afloat. The Norwegian government has policies that encourage national prosperity throughout the country.
If Alberta didn't send so much money in equalization payments, we'd obviously be much better off financially. We have been boned in two ways. The first is the federal policies that encourage regional disparities and require wealth transfer to the "have-not" provinces.
The second and most frustrating in my mind is the series of arrogant and corrupt governments that we have had in Alberta. Ralph Klein got things under control and headed in the right direction, and had his successors kept it up we would be in a position to weather these downturns. But the incompetence and arrogance of stelmach and Redford squandered everything we had, and now a protest vote gone bad has given us the most incompetent and business unfriendly government in Canadian history.
 

X-Treme

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
4,141
Location
Strathcona County
Website
www.robinsautomotive.ca
Norwegians also pay MUCH higher taxes than us, but I agree. The previous governments have TOTALLY pissed all of that coulda, shoulda, woulda away.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3 using Tapatalk.
 

Stompin Tom

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
3,787
Reaction score
8,138
Location
BC
Wonder if Norway had to transfer vast sums of its wealth to other regions ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Im a bit confused here, Norway is a country, Alberta is a province, if comparing shouldnt the the talk be that CANADA should have a Trillion plus surplus?
 

rzrgade

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
7,580
Reaction score
14,760
Location
West of Toronto
Lol I love this comparison .... How big is Norway ? How big is Canada , think of the infrastructure we all want Across the whole country......
the costs to provide this is many times the costs of that in Norway !
Think if Alberta was a lone country for the last 20 years ish ....
we would of had money to burn, look at the amount of tax that we pay federally , PLUS transfer payments ...!!!
lets compare apples to apples ...please !
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,745
Reaction score
17,680
Location
Prince George
Everyone should know this, Justin Trudeau is on a spending spree. When your in debt right up to your eye balls you have to borrow money. But being the government they have a second option... print money. Now some people might think that printing money makes prices go through the roof, awe what do they know. Just think how much smarter Justin Trudeau would appear if everyone just smoked pot. Life is a game, who needs to work, if you need money just go to the bank. Rob Peter to pay Paul
 

rzrgade

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
7,580
Reaction score
14,760
Location
West of Toronto
We had a economist who worked his way up to be a prime minister, and we have a part time drama teacher who inherited millions , and has never borrowed a cent in his life....
who is better qualified .....we out west will come to regret JT more than we can ever imagine . Not only is he unqualified , bot he has it out for oil/ Alberta ...., just like his father did.
i will concede he has better hair than the old man though....,
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,745
Reaction score
17,680
Location
Prince George
Not a lot of people who care about debt, but for the few who do. Pierre Trudeau increased our debt by 738.7 % when he was in power. Followed by the next great one who signed nafta Mulroney at 67.6% increase.
 
Last edited:

mick

Active member
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
113
Reaction score
156
Location
Alberta
We had a economist who worked his way up to be a prime minister, and we have a part time drama teacher who inherited millions , and has never borrowed a cent in his life....
who is better qualified .....we out west will come to regret JT more than we can ever imagine . Not only is he unqualified , bot he has it out for oil/ Alberta ...., just like his father did.
i will concede he has better hair than the old man though....,

Keith or Mick?
 
Top Bottom