imdoo'n
Active VIP Member
The rumination of female psychologists or sex crime prosecutors are hardly non biased sources. To them men are not to be believed under any circumstances, and that women HAVE to be believed in circumstances of he said/ she said. If that is the new standard of proof, then all us men are in trouble. There’s a reason that innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of British common law and the western justice systems.
Imagine you as an employer or supervisor had a meeting with a female employee 10 years ago. She later says that you made advances, grabbed her teats and threatened her job if she didn’t put out and calls the cops. She can’t recall the date, place, or time or any other pertinent details other than it was you. You are now in Judge Kavanaughs shoes. How do you prove you didn’t say it? It won’t matter anyway, because you’re automatically guilty. You’re now a sex offender in everyone’s eyes, and you’ll probably bankrupt yourself defending an unproven accusation that you have no way of proving your innocence of.
Would you be outraged and defend yourself? Or just meekly surrender and give up everything you’ve worked for all your life?
The idea that if you defend yourself vigorously proves your guilt even more because you don’t frame your Defense in a certain way is even more preposterous.
The progressives that are advancing this idea of automatic guilt or guilt by association are dangerous people. It’s the legal standard in dictatorships where you’re charged,found guilty, sentenced and taken away all in one motion. If you’re one of the elite ruling class or their friends, no big deal. If you’re not, watch out!
yes ford would have the means to tell a convincing tale. and would be highly suspect , if she had just made the accusation in 2018, but the accusation was placed in 2012! oh wow!
she also named 3-4 people who were at the house party and those involved. where a liar would have only named Kavanaugh? interesting as his statement in his defence he was also found to be not telling the truth. confirmation would be done if who had party came forward?