- Moderator
- #41
track speed is awsome for blasting unsupecting newbies with massive amounts of snow when they park to close to the back of your sled
With snow flap removed???
track speed is awsome for blasting unsupecting newbies with massive amounts of snow when they park to close to the back of your sled
With snow flap removed???
Does track speed play a role in sled performance ?
Some engineers dont think so. 174 x 3" x 16 on an 800. hahaha
Some engineers dont think so. 174 x 3" x 16 on an 800. hahaha
Lol ya that will never work!!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Track speed matters but Traction matters more.
In asphalt drag racing, lose traction and you lose the race. Same with mountain sledding. There is a fine line though. After 150hp it is difficult to maintain traction. The sled handles more like a jet ski after breaking traction. Until the turbo sled gets enough ground speed to almost match the track speed, the setup stocker that maintains traction will beat the turbo.
Check out the turbo sleds in 2017,18 & 19 Stock rear suspension, boost cranked up, trenching and wheelieing(is that even a word?) skis sky high in the air. A setup stock sled with traction would easily beat the turbos. It is funny to watch. Whatevs, it’s good entertainment. It’s also good entertainment to reply to a five year old thread. Cheers fackers !
Let’s hear your theory.You sure about this part of your statement. I call BS coming about here.
Let’s hear your theory.
not sure it works quite like that. on hard pack for example you arent moving any snow, yet you still move forward.
same thing with the jet boat. you don't need to move 4000lbs of water to get it to go forward. I could get out and push it and I weigh 220.
You're missing the point. The point is there are 2 ways to move a sled. Push off a solid object or hurl a mass of snow backward. How much traction does a 747 have and it goes forward? The equivalent mass of the gases moving out of the jet engines have to overcome the mass of the plane. The turboed sled does not just rely on traction of solid snow. It "can" also thrust forward by throwing snow backwards and they do that very well. ps. 220 Dan? you better go on a diet, LOL.
I'm 6 foot 3 so kinda skinny right now 240lbs is a more solid weight for me lol
I get what your saying, but I get what Kane dog is saying too.
for example a stock 174 will most likely out climb a turbo 136 on a pow day just tractoring along whilst the 136 would have all kinds of track speed.
I don't disagree if the snow is right but then there will be days that the results are reversed so I account that to the different methods for moving forward. (snow conditions)
Let’s hear your theory.
“Overpowers its traction.” So true. Imagine how good a sled would go if the track was always just below breaking traction, the perfect amount. That’s what the above clutches will do when setup correctly. The performance is crazy.Neither sled will ever be the same nor handle the same and in two feet of snow. I really don't give a **** to be honest. I have both in the shed and ride each when the conditions warrant the ride. I find a stock 3" track will take me just about anywhere the 3" Turbo will just at slower speeds. In two feet of snow from a dead stop the stock sled will out perform because of its lack of HP compared to the turbo which overpowers its traction very easily. I don't find this hard to understand at all. Paragon clutch on the other hand will improve any sled you install them on. They are custom made and very expensive which is why probably won't ever see one from the factory. A nice piece of hardware.
oh and thanks for the insult it almost hurt my feelings
I don’t know but now I have something to analyze in my clutch brain.jet boats are like fire hoses... it doesn't have to spray in the water, it can spray into the air and still move forward. so does the snow flying out of the tunnel with no flap push the sled forward? the snow would act like a non compressible fluid flying into the air, that has to create thrust no?