imdoo'n
Active VIP Member
were did you get such nice pictures, lots of questions on a graph of something, from somewhere, about something, looks like fake news?
Climate emergency!
- Thread starter Mike270412
- Start date
were did you get such nice pictures, lots of questions on a graph of something, from somewhere, about something, looks like fake news?
jhurkot
Active VIP Member
A fake news site called NASA.
imdoo'n
Active VIP Member
hmm were did they get the numbers, did they go all over the world for samples, way too many questions to even start to think it's true. a real scientist would show his work, how he came to conclusion, etc etc. graph is crap as it sits. nothing on the nice pics says anything about nasa?
Last edited:
jhurkot
Active VIP Member
Would you accept the graph as true if it came directly from NASA?
imdoo'n
Active VIP Member
well lets put it this way, the graph pertains to something what who knows. i saw a few graphs from the Ndp that where cherry picked, left a lot of pertinent info out, just to produce the desired result.
X-it
Active VIP Member
Backing up the greenland ice cores are accurate proof of weather over that last 10000 years.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/en...e-the-vikings-out-of-greenland-say-scientists
https://www.discovermagazine.com/en...e-the-vikings-out-of-greenland-say-scientists
DaveB
Active VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #88
Mike270412
Golden Boy
Everyone is not arriving at the same conclusion.
- Thread starter
- #89
Mike270412
Golden Boy
Caper11
Active VIP Member
Was nasa around 1000 years ago???
X-it
Active VIP Member
Everyone sh!ts in the oceans and some countries are using it as a garbage dump. The bacteria plumb is coming ...again... and when it does we are all dead, no one seems concerned with the real threat.
jhurkot
Active VIP Member
https://youtu.be/pEb49cZYnsE
[h=3]Scientific organizations endorsing the consensus[/h]The following scientific organizations endorse the consensus position that "most of the global warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities":
- American Chemical Society
- American Meteorological Society
- American Physical Society
- Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
- Geological Society of America
- Geological Society of London
- International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
- National Center for Atmospheric Research
- Royal Society of the UK
X-it
Active VIP Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition Over 31000 silenced signatures
Cdnfireman
Active VIP Member
The statement right at the start shows how unscientific their arguments are.... the “consensus “ position that “most” of the global warming.....how many degrees, percent, parts per million are in a “most”?
- Thread starter
- #95
Mike270412
Golden Boy
- Thread starter
- #96
Mike270412
Golden Boy
[FONT="]Climate science is in a state of crisis because climate scientists, enamored with their broad consensus regarding greenhouse-warming theory, refuse to face the remarkably clear physical reality that greenhouse-warming theory is not even physically possible. What has happened to [/FONT]scientific objectivity[FONT="]? Politics requires consensus, but science required debate. As Michael Crichton explained: “In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”[/FONT]
- Thread starter
- #97
Mike270412
Golden Boy
- Thread starter
- #98
Mike270412
Golden Boy
Caper11
Active VIP Member
The real question is, How many are willing to give up their creature comforts, hobbies and their way of life to reduce the CO2 100ppm?
Did industrialization cause the increase? Maybe, I dunno need way more data other than charts that has huge potential for error and corruption in them.
Regardless, that industrialization has provided us with our way of life. Want to change? Than start watching the little house on the prairie, and prepare for the new way of life.
Did industrialization cause the increase? Maybe, I dunno need way more data other than charts that has huge potential for error and corruption in them.
Regardless, that industrialization has provided us with our way of life. Want to change? Than start watching the little house on the prairie, and prepare for the new way of life.
imdoo'n
Active VIP Member
Similar threads
