What? I can't quite figure out the physics on that one LHF Care to elaborate?
a quick easy equation, (now there are many variables) but 1 lb boost equals a 7% HP gain. 14 lbs would be a 98% power increase, so roughly just under 300 ponies.
I guess i wasn't very clear. Making the motor bigger cc is NOT better IMO. My point was that you can do many things aside from rods and pistons that will make way more power. Pure logic is good and simple. Sometimes simple is good.oh yeah i know that you can bore and stroke on top of turbos, but to me that is getting alittle excessive, ive ridden a friends apex that is bored to a 1200 and stroked (not sure what the new stoke is) but honestly you cannot control the power you have, i guess the benefit if you can call it that is that you can run lower boost.....but it is damn expernsive to bore and stroke em... but thanks for the info guys and yeah that rapid bike seems like a pretty awesome system for fuel management, i think im going to try that out, i do not like pure logic, like u say, to simple.
At elevation your sled won't make any more power over say 18-19 lbs boost with your current setup unless for some reason you had very low compression, which it sounds like you do not. A 2860 turbo will fall on it's face at about 19-20 lbs boost depending on elevation and barometric pressure. Even if your turbo could keep up, the injectors are pretty much maxed at 20 lbs boost running stock fuel pressure. All turbo kits should make relatively the same amount of power at the same boost (to a point). A bigger turbo will move more air at equal boost pressure of a smaller turbo, so really a bigger turbo is just more efficient.
Just so you know...your motor is far from being built to it's potential with stock bore and stroke. I know of a few Apex motors that would make way more power at 14 lbs then yours would at 18-19. Just sayin.