jpgmtech
Active VIP Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 339
- Reaction score
- 866
- Location
- Drayton Valley
- Website
- www.payntonperformance.com
Just to add my two bits: I've been testing and observing how the PRO and XM handle over the first part of the season myself, and I am personally finding that the XM seems to be the friendlier of the two. I ride an XP now, coming from an older chassis before that. XP was a learning curve for me, but I've got the setup and riding style pretty well figured now - to the point that an XM seems more like a refinement than a revelation.
One thing about the XM that I did notice and like right away is its responsiveness to very slight weight shifts. On uneven or rutted climbs it actually feels a bit more stable, possibly because you can correct with just a bit of toe pressure. An XP in the same climb wants to take you left and right a whole lot more. Still, I can throw the XP into anything and anywhere an XM goes without a problem, but then I'm probably 240 lbs geared up... As for the PRO, it annoys me to ride it. I would like to spend a bunch more time tweaking and tuning the PRO because I think it definitely has potential but I don't have that much riding time to waste!
One thing about the XM that I did notice and like right away is its responsiveness to very slight weight shifts. On uneven or rutted climbs it actually feels a bit more stable, possibly because you can correct with just a bit of toe pressure. An XP in the same climb wants to take you left and right a whole lot more. Still, I can throw the XP into anything and anywhere an XM goes without a problem, but then I'm probably 240 lbs geared up... As for the PRO, it annoys me to ride it. I would like to spend a bunch more time tweaking and tuning the PRO because I think it definitely has potential but I don't have that much riding time to waste!