Belt drive on 2015 163 T3

X-Treme

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
4,141
Location
Strathcona County
Website
www.robinsautomotive.ca
Heres what I did... Pick a chain to Get ride of the tensioner. Reliability of the chain, efficiency is probably nearing very close to a belt drive. Bang for the buck I think your further ahead with a pipe kit. Larger weight saving and more torque picked up in the midrange than the belt will give you. Belt drive is not going to give you anything noticeable on the top end.

View attachment 184502

So, are you running oil-less then? Any adverse effects?
 

pfi572

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
15,264
Location
Grande Prairie
You can't run that chain oil-less.
He's just showing the tight chain without tensioner .
 

deaner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
3,221
Reaction score
11,163
Location
Creston, BC
You would still run the tensioner though, just eliminating the dogleg right?
 

oler1234

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,614
Reaction score
6,108
Location
Calgary, AB & Golden, BC
No tensioner and no dog leg. As you see in that picture, the cover was put on and she was filled with automatic transmission fluid. 2000km right now and no problems.

if I am not mistaken baker and specialty both have a setup with no tensioner running Hyvo gears and chain for the extended cases.

edit... For those that kick your sled in reverse while going down hill, doing this with a tensioner can snap it. Obviously without a tensioner this won't happen.
 
Last edited:

adamg

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
4,673
Location
S'toon,SK
ATF is a good substitute for doo's special chaincase oil?
 

AreWeThereYet

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
12,775
Reaction score
7,554
Location
Grande Prairie
I have a hard time shelling out $1000 to lighten up 4-5lbs, even if it has a 4/5 cool factor. Maybe next year I will splurge for the C3 and I can say to some of my Pro friends,.. "look, I have a belt drive that is more reliable" :)
 

stormtrooper

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
266
Reaction score
144
Location
wct, ab
ATF is a good substitute for doo's special chaincase oil?

You are better off using synthetic 75w-90 gear oil. Get the $20 per bottle stuff. The stuff that's 10$ per bottle is not going to be full synthetic oil and will not be as good at lower winter temps. If I remember right you will get 3 changes from one bottle.
 

oler1234

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,614
Reaction score
6,108
Location
Calgary, AB & Golden, BC
ATF is a good substitute for doo's special chaincase oil?


Yup. It's what you also run in the transfer case of your truck. Lower viscosity and less drag when everything is cycling is most efficient. in the mountains your really not into it long enough to build up heat to require a high viscosity of fluid for protection.
 

deaner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
3,221
Reaction score
11,163
Location
Creston, BC
I found in previous sleds that I ran ATF in I always had a tonne of filings in my chaincase. Chain tension was always checked and set properly. You havent found this?

And if your chain fits with the perfect tension when you put it on....what happens when it stretches out a bit? I cant believe that you can get the perfect chain length to fit that precisely?
 

stormtrooper

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
266
Reaction score
144
Location
wct, ab
I remember reading a post at one point and want to say it was Tom himself stating his belt drive was actually heavier than stock chain. That may have been an earlier version? In the same thread guys were say the c3 was quite a bit lighter. Something to do with material type used for the sprockets was heavier on tki vs c3. Apparently we need some pics of all parts on calibrated scales. Lol. A silent chain drive is over 99.5% efficient when you look at any documentation. I can't see efficiency being measurably better except that maybe the sliding resistance the chain tensioner has vs a pulley. If I was to get one it would be for quick gear ratio changes and no fear of wrecking chain drive.
 

chris79

Active member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
137
Reaction score
147
Location
foremost alberta
I remember reading a post at one point and want to say it was Tom himself stating his belt drive was actually heavier than stock chain. That may have been an earlier version? In the same thread guys were say the c3 was quite a bit lighter. Something to do with material type used for the sprockets was heavier on tki vs c3. Apparently we need some pics of all parts on calibrated scales. Lol. A silent chain drive is over 99.5% efficient when you look at any documentation. I can't see efficiency being measurably better except that maybe the sliding resistance the chain tensioner has vs a pulley. If I was to get one it would be for quick gear ratio changes and no fear of wrecking chain drive.

I like the option of different ratios too. I have a 20 top tooth on my chain drive now. Can get very close to that same ratio or even close to the 19 top with c3.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

chris79

Active member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
137
Reaction score
147
Location
foremost alberta
Yup. It's what you also run in the transfer case of your truck. Lower viscosity and less drag when everything is cycling is most efficient. in the mountains your really not into it long enough to build up heat to require a high viscosity of fluid for protection.

Never tried it in a chain case. Run it in all the wet kits on our grain augers. Much better in very cold temps. Totally different application i know, but never caused a pump failure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

oler1234

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,614
Reaction score
6,108
Location
Calgary, AB & Golden, BC
I found in previous sleds that I ran ATF in I always had a tonne of filings in my chaincase. Chain tension was always checked and set properly. You havent found this?

And if your chain fits with the perfect tension when you put it on....what happens when it stretches out a bit? I cant believe that you can get the perfect chain length to fit that precisely?

there is some filings on the magnet, could always run what your comfortable with.

to let out all the secrets.... chain tension was tighter than I liked at the start but as you say it broke in nicely and is perfect.

but as you see in the picture that's how it is run:beer:
 

snochuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
6,172
Reaction score
20,025
Location
Edmonton
I have not done a lot of mountain riding, maybe 20k on 4 sleds, have changed oil a total of 6 times and changed only one chain and blown none. I will not be getting a belt drive as chain drive are really not that unreliable. Don't need the cool factor at the cabin as I don't hang out there much. Cool factor is who gets up through the trees fastest in pretty much every group.
Be saving my cash for when my run through the trees is not clean and I need more a arms as they have failed me way more than the chain drive on a stock powered sled.
:twocents:
 

FranktheTank

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
624
Reaction score
1,232
Location
Regina/Bc
I have a hard time shelling out $1000 to lighten up 4-5lbs, even if it has a 4/5 cool factor. Maybe next year I will splurge for the C3 and I can say to some of my Pro friends,.. "look, I have a belt drive that is more reliable" :)

4/5 cool factor? maybe 5 years ago when they came out.
 
Top Bottom