Not on their site yet. Where did you find them and any info?
Might be other reasons for the drop and roll and driver changes.......Zal... With any luck maybe there is something else coming...
Guessing cat/yammy doesn't feel 174 is worth it. Sure getting pushed in the other 2 manufacturers . So the 17 sidewinder would have 7t drivers then? Funny that the 17 king cat has the lower 8t drivers but not the 17 yammy.
Doo Dealers have 174 sleds left over, blowing them out. Buddy picked up new 2016 for 10,500 all in
Guessing cat/yammy doesn't feel 174 is worth it. Sure getting pushed in the other 2 manufacturers . So the 17 sidewinder would have 7t drivers then? Funny that the 17 king cat has the lower 8t drivers but not the 17 yammy.
The new driver change and drop and roll will help it get up on the snow and hook, which is almost as important as track length IMO. They might have just been "demoing" it on the King Cat last year, which was why Yammy didn't get it? Yammy maybe didn't feel the value in it yet? they may have built the Yammy's first and Cat came out with later on in R&D testing after the Yammy's were spec'd for production? Maybe Cat just kept it up their sleeve to give them a little edge on the chassis side.
Regardless - These new chassis's are getting better every year. The Cat and Yammy 9000s are also the only sleds that are making the same HP and torque at elevation as at the parking lot, and will compensate for the lack of track and weight. I think a lot of time the 174 is overrated in an 800 class sled once you drag it up to 6000 ft and put it in 2 ft of snow. I'd love to see an unbiased review of a side by side comparison to the new Sidewinder 162" with the chaincase improvements and any of the other 174" sleds (an honest review!!!) because I don't think things will be that far off with these new sleds. Snowests review of the King Cat last year was pretty comparable (with the 8T drivers).
If we start looking at the power to weight ratios, they are actually in favour of the boosted 4S at elevation. Its still an extra 60 lbs you have to throw around though, so can still feel the weight. Slow rolling in the thick lumber might have to give the edge to the 174, because you're not using boost to any kind of its potential, but once the track speeds increase a bit..... likely be closer than most think. This is based on my experience riding with boosted 4 stroke 162" sleds and 2 stroke 174" tracks. Also, the Sidewinder and the King Cat are already pushing $20K without a 174", so they might have been trying to keep the price point lower and comparable to the competition for marketing, but that would only be my personal speculation for a possible reason to not offer it.