Why won't Camo make a 3" track shorter than 162??

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
5,538
Location
Edmonton
Jeez, I know 5 peeps myself that would buy one in a heartbeat!!!:cool:

It's not the length in this case, it's the girth.:d

I want a 154 please....
 

Cyle

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
7,186
Reaction score
4,762
Location
edmonton
Why wouldn't you want a 162"? 154 is a short track now! :p
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,156
Reaction score
43,678
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
theres a thread on snowest that they are trying to get people to vote or something for camoplast to make one.


i supose a 3" 154 would be an extremely agile sled and still be a wicked climber.

i guess they figure people will go to a 162 x 2.5 before a 3" 154
 

NM

Boost It - Fuel your Boost
Joined
Aug 18, 2008
Messages
975
Reaction score
3,069
Location
Central Alberta
How much diff is 4 less inches of track on the snow really going to make?
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,772
Reaction score
5,538
Location
Edmonton
I used to have a REV with a 162 x 16 x 2.5
The 154 vs the 163 is a noticeable difference to me.
I prefer tight tree manoeuvres, the 154 shines there for sure. Power carves in semi set up snow without the slingshot effect...
Also in the spring, which I also love riding, it's not as pushy.
 
Top Bottom