powersports88
New member
What's the point (pun intended) of all manufacturers inserting an upside down triangle (wedge) carbide in the host bar?
They get flatter and less effective with every mile of wear. Different manufacturers can make as many variations as they want, but at the end of the day, they all get duller as they wear. Your sled performs worse with every mile you put on it.
Sure, they last a long time, because the sharp wedge gets wider and flatter and duller as it wears. Then it just becomes a massive wear pad that can't cut into anything, but skids over any terrain with a slowed rate of wear.
If you say the brand you run stays sharp longer, it's because:
1) You were riding less harsh terrain than with the last set.
2) Manufacturers can add short wear pads at different points along the host bar, with higher or lower profiles which can increase or reduce penetration and spread the load out to reduce wear on the "when new" point.
3) Manufacturers can create a dual runner so the forces are less therefore wear time can be reduced, but you sacrifice penetration and pay a higher price
4) You can even add carbide wedges to the side, but you sacrifice penetration of the center point by spreading the load and pay a higher price.
5) The manufacturers can offer/claim a different hardness of carbide (rockwell) but that difference is going to be negligible.
Are any manufacturers offering something other than a wedge carbide? Come on, for the trail rider the round bar and wedge is technology from the '80s. Suspension technology has grown by leaps and bounds, so have skis. What about the one item that actually makes contact with the ground?
Other than the above, I haven't really given it much thought...really.
They get flatter and less effective with every mile of wear. Different manufacturers can make as many variations as they want, but at the end of the day, they all get duller as they wear. Your sled performs worse with every mile you put on it.
Sure, they last a long time, because the sharp wedge gets wider and flatter and duller as it wears. Then it just becomes a massive wear pad that can't cut into anything, but skids over any terrain with a slowed rate of wear.
If you say the brand you run stays sharp longer, it's because:
1) You were riding less harsh terrain than with the last set.
2) Manufacturers can add short wear pads at different points along the host bar, with higher or lower profiles which can increase or reduce penetration and spread the load out to reduce wear on the "when new" point.
3) Manufacturers can create a dual runner so the forces are less therefore wear time can be reduced, but you sacrifice penetration and pay a higher price
4) You can even add carbide wedges to the side, but you sacrifice penetration of the center point by spreading the load and pay a higher price.
5) The manufacturers can offer/claim a different hardness of carbide (rockwell) but that difference is going to be negligible.
Are any manufacturers offering something other than a wedge carbide? Come on, for the trail rider the round bar and wedge is technology from the '80s. Suspension technology has grown by leaps and bounds, so have skis. What about the one item that actually makes contact with the ground?
Other than the above, I haven't really given it much thought...really.