takethebounce
Active VIP Member
So, I am going to give you all free reign to post what you wish as long as it directly relates to my dilemma.
I am in the market for a new sled for next winter. Currently on a 2012 Summit X 154. About 3000 miles on it since new and needs a new motor. It was a spring order '12 who I took over the purchase on and the buyer took the discount rather than extended year warranty. So its out of warranty and needs a motor. Regardless, it will get the motor and it will become my second sled when I sell my '09 (which also has a brand new short block).
I have been on the fence for a year or so. Go to the Pro, or stick with Doo on a XM. Now my reasons for wanting to go to the Pro are very obvious for me which I will list, my reasons for maybe going to the XM are also obvious. What I want is pure experience related responses based on fact. Obviously I am asking for a lot but I can weed through the crap.
As a rider, I am pretty much a lightweight, almost middle aged guy who wants to be in the ugliest, steep, tree'd, drainage, technical bomb hole possible. My abilities are decent as far as I am concerned. I sometimes ride with some exceptional guys with far more ability than I have but am not going to turn down a challenge. Straight up climbs and meadows are not for me.
SO the match up 2015 XM - X 163 or 2015 Pro RMK 163
On the Pro -
Its lighter overall and as a light guy I notice it
Even though makes less HP, the power feels just as efficient due to its clutching (being lighter helps)
On edge, washed out, the RMK will still move forward vs. the XM which wants to point up
Kick some snow under a Pro and it will climb out of most holes with its rigid suspension
Simple engine design
Clutching with belt drive doesn't need lots of attention
Works well for aggressive riders
What I consider further negatives is that I am still not used to pointing this thing in a straight line. I am very comfortable riding it in technical terrain. I am not familar with dealer support for local Poo dealers (cycle works) and warranty issues should they come up.
on the XM -
Still a heavier machine
Great power throughout the rpm range
Very confident in my dealer and the support they provide
Very comfortable on the XM as its an easy transition from my '12 (which already has various upgrades)
T-motion makes up for the 16" wide track an responds to rider input with less effort than the XP
Still not happy with the soft suspension design of the XM. Torsion springs need to go.
The TRA needs attention. Full rebuilds of springs, bushings, and so on and with the amount of riding we do I would be doing clutch rebuilds half way through a season if done properly.
I know the grass isn't greener on the other side. I have just about convinced myself its time for a change. But a RMK is still unfamilar to me. It would be like going from my GM to a Dodge.
I am in the market for a new sled for next winter. Currently on a 2012 Summit X 154. About 3000 miles on it since new and needs a new motor. It was a spring order '12 who I took over the purchase on and the buyer took the discount rather than extended year warranty. So its out of warranty and needs a motor. Regardless, it will get the motor and it will become my second sled when I sell my '09 (which also has a brand new short block).
I have been on the fence for a year or so. Go to the Pro, or stick with Doo on a XM. Now my reasons for wanting to go to the Pro are very obvious for me which I will list, my reasons for maybe going to the XM are also obvious. What I want is pure experience related responses based on fact. Obviously I am asking for a lot but I can weed through the crap.
As a rider, I am pretty much a lightweight, almost middle aged guy who wants to be in the ugliest, steep, tree'd, drainage, technical bomb hole possible. My abilities are decent as far as I am concerned. I sometimes ride with some exceptional guys with far more ability than I have but am not going to turn down a challenge. Straight up climbs and meadows are not for me.
SO the match up 2015 XM - X 163 or 2015 Pro RMK 163
On the Pro -
Its lighter overall and as a light guy I notice it
Even though makes less HP, the power feels just as efficient due to its clutching (being lighter helps)
On edge, washed out, the RMK will still move forward vs. the XM which wants to point up
Kick some snow under a Pro and it will climb out of most holes with its rigid suspension
Simple engine design
Clutching with belt drive doesn't need lots of attention
Works well for aggressive riders
What I consider further negatives is that I am still not used to pointing this thing in a straight line. I am very comfortable riding it in technical terrain. I am not familar with dealer support for local Poo dealers (cycle works) and warranty issues should they come up.
on the XM -
Still a heavier machine
Great power throughout the rpm range
Very confident in my dealer and the support they provide
Very comfortable on the XM as its an easy transition from my '12 (which already has various upgrades)
T-motion makes up for the 16" wide track an responds to rider input with less effort than the XP
Still not happy with the soft suspension design of the XM. Torsion springs need to go.
The TRA needs attention. Full rebuilds of springs, bushings, and so on and with the amount of riding we do I would be doing clutch rebuilds half way through a season if done properly.
I know the grass isn't greener on the other side. I have just about convinced myself its time for a change. But a RMK is still unfamilar to me. It would be like going from my GM to a Dodge.