Trudy Commits 25% of land to be protected by 2025

rknight111

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
13,661
Reaction score
23,330
Location
Parkland County, AB and Valemount, BC
Website
www.snowandmud.com
This black faced lying clown has now committed that 25% of Canada’s land is to be protected by 2025. First of all I sure hope that this waste of space is done with before the next election time. And hope election time the liberals are up packing. I’m not sure what currently is protected. Does this include the territory’s?
44f214aac4b60e47819852c094bb3b73.jpg
 

Bogger

Bogger of the GBCA
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
24,421
Reaction score
18,492
Location
Down by the Bay
Protecting land and water is not a bad idea, the problem is the Liberal's definiton of "Protecting" - Typically by protecting they mean leave it alone, no one can use it, no business, no industry, no recreation (especially motorized)

Conserved areas are lands and waters where use is limited. In some cases, certain commercial activities and harvesting of biological resources may be allowed so long as they do not go against conservation objectives of the area.Terrestrial area conserved has increased by 65% in the last 20 years and by 8% in the last 5 years. Marine area conserved has increased by more than 3 800% in the last 20 years and by more than 1 000% in the last 5 years. In 2019, Canada surpassed its 2020 marine conservation target of 10%, by conserving 13.8% of its marine territory. Conserved lands.png
 
  • Thread starter
  • Admin
  • #3

rknight111

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
13,661
Reaction score
23,330
Location
Parkland County, AB and Valemount, BC
Website
www.snowandmud.com
It appears that B.C. has more protected land that every other province. Although the caraboo heards have been reported to be almost gone, they are food for all the bears being introduced in the mountains by humans and lack of hunting permits for bears.
 

moyiesledhead

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5,455
Reaction score
10,890
Location
Moyie B.C.
It appears that B.C. has more protected land that every other province. Although the caraboo heards have been reported to be almost gone, they are food for all the bears being introduced in the mountains by humans and lack of hunting permits for bears.

Wolves are still overwhelmingly the leading cause of Mountain Caribou mortality.
 

imdoo'n

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
58,408
Reaction score
51,855
Location
alberta from the back porch
I thought this was another one of his fake promises to gain media attention, I thought something like 24% of the land in Canada was already protected between all the parks and other areas?
the way this prick thinks , people will think another 25% of Canadian lands will be protected. in reality he is saying only another 1 %. gets him lots of votes, for absolutely nothing, people need to wake up to the meat head.
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
108,597
Reaction score
105,255
Location
Milo,Alberta
the way this prick thinks , people will think another 25% of Canadian lands will be protected. in reality he is saying only another 1 %. gets him lots of votes, for absolutely nothing, people need to wake up to the meat head.
Same with the $400 million in spending he talked about yesterday. They had committed that money in 2019 but brought it up again today as now th money is finally available. The morning guy on QR said you need to check these guys on everything. They lie to us all the time with misleading info
 

retiredpop

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
1,726
Reaction score
5,190
Location
Calgary
I just received this from BSP in Montana. It's pretty serious according to the third paragraph of the letter. I know Canada is different in our rights to crown land use but nevertheless it is concerning what is going on down there.

Biden’s 30x30 land grab update!
It was only a matter of time before local land trusts were no longer in control of conservation easements and they became an asset of value. Landowners with their property encumbered with a conservation easement will begin seeing their development rights traded on the NY Stock exchange where national and international interests can invest in these resources and become the owner of these rights. The subservient landowner will now become the tenant under the control of the “Natural Asset Companies.

On October 4th, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a proposed rule to approve listing Natural Asset Companies (NACs) on the New York Stock Exchange. NACs are how elite investors would profit from the lands created by Biden’s 30x30 agenda as the permanent “protection” plan of at least 30 percent of the land and oceans by 2030.

If this rule is approved, it will allow investors such as Blackrock, Bill Gates, and possibly China to hold the rights to the land, water, air, and natural processes of the properties enrolled in the NACs. Small land trusts have accumulated enough development rights over the years to make this transfer of property rights attractive to investors. NGO land trusts will simply enroll their development and resource rights into the NACs and obtain huge financial gain without the landowner even being aware.

This land rights grab is alive and well in Montana where the USFWS is proposing a 5.8-million-acre Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area (MHCA) in SW Montana. Under the guise of obtaining Land and Water Conservation Funds for the purchase of additional Conservation Easements in the MHCA, the USFWS is really hoodwinking the public into believing there is no alternative agenda. Nothing could be further from the truth. The director of the USFWS is Martha Williams who has a long history of proposals removing people from the land. Her boss, Tracy Stone-Manning director of the BLM, was involved in a tree spiking incident to shut down the timber industry when she was with the Clark Fork Coalition. Her actions are well documented but she was never held accountable.

David Allen with the USFWS claimed at a meeting I attended that this MHCA designation “will have NO effect on the allowed uses of public lands within the 5.8 million acres” but in his next statement he admits “the plan for this area has not been written.” So, which is it David? You claim NO effect but there is NO plan. We expect there will be additional restrictions placed on the use of these public lands and any surface disturbance activity will surely be challenged in court by environmental organizations based on the location being within this new Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area. And with millions of dollars coming from the LWCF to purchase conservation easements in the MHCA, more property owners will find themselves at the mercy of foreign investors gaining control of their property.

There was overwhelming opposition to the MHCA at the 4 public meetings held by the USFWS but CBU knows this proposal is on track to be approved. This land grab plan has been in the works for years and only under the current Biden administration have the proponents found the support to move forward. The final plan is scheduled to be finalized in late 2024. How convenient!
It is important for people to comment and take action!
HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS

Comments can be submitted in multiple ways:

Email: MOHWCA@fws.gov

Mailing Address: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attn: Ben Gilles, 922 Bootlegger Trail Great Falls, MT 59404

Call our Congressional delegation and urge them to defund Conservation Areas! Rescind the Land and Water Conservation Funds for this purpose! Defund every action the Biden Administration is using to implement 30x30.​
 
Top Bottom