Trudeau bids to change National Anthem

KermitZx6r

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
58
Reaction score
19
Location
YEG
Liberal MP launches fresh bid to get

OTTAWA — Liberal MP Mauril Belanger is losing his own singing voice but that’s not stopping him from trying — for a second time — to change the English lyrics to O Canada to make the national anthem more gender neutral.


The veteran Ottawa MP, whose vocal chords have been weakened by Lou Gehrig’s disease, is determined to end the song’s inference that patriotism is something felt exclusively by men.

Hence, soon after Parliament resumes work today, he intends to table a private member’s bill that would alter two words, changing the second line of the anthem from true patriot love “in all thy sons command” to “in all of us command.”

Belanger introduced an identical bill in the last session of Parliament; it was defeated at second reading last April by a close vote of 144-127.

At the time, MPs from all the opposition parties supported the change but almost all Conservative MPs voted against it.

With the Liberals now in the majority, Belanger should have little trouble finally ensuring that women feel equally included in the national anthem.

Passage of the bill would be a fitting legacy for Belanger, who was diagnosed just a month after the Oct. 19 federal election with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. It is an incurable, progressive, neurodegenerative disease that causes muscle weakness, paralysis and, eventually, respiratory failure.

“I remain committed to proposing this legislative initiative,” Belanger said in a recent posting on his Facebook page.

“I intend to table my bill when the House of Commons resumes in late January 2016 and can expect to initiate the debate on the bill around April.”

Belanger said the objective of the bill is to “pay tribute to all the women who have worked and fought to build and shape the Canada that we know today … to at long last honour their sacrifices and contributions.”

O Canada was originally composed by Calixa Lavallee in 1880, with French lyrics by Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier.

It took about 20 years for the song to surface in English Canada, where various versions of the lyrics were tried out.

Belanger has noted that his proposed change would actually return the lyrics closer to one of the versions most widely used in the early 1900s: “True patriot love thou dost in us command.” That line was changed to “in all thy sons command” at the time of the First World War, presumably to honour men in the armed forces, according to The Canadian Encyclopedia.

The last time the English lyrics were changed was in 1980, when O Canada was officially adopted as the national anthem. At that time, repetitive phrases were replaced with “From far and wide, O Canada” and “God keep our land, glorious and free.”

Since then, there have been at least 10 attempts to change the second line to include women — all of which have failed.

Stephen Harper’s Conservative government broached the idea in a 2010 throne speech, but abandoned it just two days later amid an angry backlash among core Tory party supporters.

In a bid to persuade Conservatives that Canadians are not averse to modernizing the anthem, Belanger last spring commissioned his own poll which suggested almost 60 per cent favour his proposed wording. All but five Conservative MPs voted against his bill anyway.
 

KermitZx6r

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
58
Reaction score
19
Location
YEG
Between this and the whole refugee situation, it's a ****ing disaster.
 

moyiesledhead

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5,455
Reaction score
10,890
Location
Moyie B.C.
stupidest thing I have even heard. What a waste of time!

No where near the stupidist thing they've done, but really.....is that the most serious problem they have to deal with?

Actually, maybe if they spend more time with this kind of crap they'll do less damage to the important stuff. :hmm:
 

the_real_wild1

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
6,966
Reaction score
7,389
Location
cardiff
I didn't read anything there about that ****tard being the one to change it. But I agree. Why in the world would people want to change it? And why was the vote so close?? Would someone go off the deep end already and head down there with a rifle???
 

freeflorider

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
2,804
Reaction score
8,756
Location
West koots
I'm like what?... Is this a ploy to take are anger away from something that seems not so stupid and past it off as a good move on dip s$@t jts behalf.
This guy is just plan stupid.
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,529
Location
Alberta
You're all a bunch of insensitive pr!cks!! It's obvious we need a royal commission to study this in detail, headed by a retired Quebec judge, a dozen or so retired liberal MP's and a couple of hundred lawyers. It will take several years of cross-country hearings to hear from all affected women's and aboriginal groups, then another year or two to compile and study the results. I think a budget of $100 million or so to start.....
 

catalac

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
3,428
Reaction score
13,124
Location
Red Deer
Im all for it if at the same time they make it legal for women to go topless in public. Guys can do it why not the gals come let's be equal now. And if pot is legal let's make whore houses legal too.
 

Clode

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
29,550
Reaction score
46,587
Location
BC
what a phuckin idiots Justin and his minions are
 

niner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
8,607
Reaction score
61,916
Location
lacombe
Next thing you know he will take the red out of our flag , which would be appropriate , Canada surrenders.
 
Top Bottom