This doesn't look like a 136" to me....

Clode

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
29,550
Reaction score
46,587
Location
BC
136...unless it has rail extensions, which it looks like it may
 

joey

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
995
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Brazil
Looks like a 121

Just realised I messed up my title haha

it's definitely not a 121, this is my 3rd mountain max, and its at least a 136". Bumper sticks out just a bit past the seat, on the 121"s the bumper is pretty well flush with the seat
 

DDrake

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
844
Reaction score
646
Location
edmonton
I would agree with Clode. Looks like a 136" at best. My son has an F5 with a 136" and that sled looks to be pretty similar.
 

joey

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
995
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Brazil
I would agree with Clode. Looks like a 136" at best. My son has an F5 with a 136" and that sled looks to be pretty similar.

My opinion exactly
 

Clode

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
29,550
Reaction score
46,587
Location
BC
those are the stock rails and skid, the 97-99 had a different tunnel extension then the 2000-04 with the 141"....it may be a 141", it looks like it has very short rail extensions
 

joey

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
995
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Brazil
those are the stock rails and skid, the 97-99 had a different tunnel extension then the 2000-04 with the 141"....it may be a 141", it looks like it has very short rail extensions


Maybe he stretched it from 136 to 144...? He says from the ski tips to the end of the track it is 9' 6" roughly
 

KevinA

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
250
Reaction score
178
Location
Vega AB
these are the best pics I could find in my files of the 144 I sold this summer.... definatly longer tunnel
 

Attachments

  • mountian max.jpg
    mountian max.jpg
    161.9 KB · Views: 554
  • photo 2.jpg
    photo 2.jpg
    236.9 KB · Views: 559

joey

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
995
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Brazil
I would definitely say its a 136 then. Although maybe he posted older pics, maybe it has been stretched since then. Anything is possible
 

KevinA

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
250
Reaction score
178
Location
Vega AB
I would definitely say its a 136 then. Although maybe he posted older pics, maybe it has been stretched since then. Anything is possible

yup... found a pic of the srx 136 from the year before.
 

Attachments

  • srx1.jpg
    srx1.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 274

lman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
165
Reaction score
126
Location
Edmonton
That's a 136". Just sold one. They were 136" from 97-99 and 141" from 2000 on.
 
Top Bottom