snopro
Active VIP Member
put them down. Lol.’they are to far gone to be viable anymore hahaThe 20k is the second line of credit. It’s insane. I can’t even talk to half my family. They might as well get on the rail car now they’re ****ed
put them down. Lol.’they are to far gone to be viable anymore hahaThe 20k is the second line of credit. It’s insane. I can’t even talk to half my family. They might as well get on the rail car now they’re ****ed
So you dont know about the bill JT passed allowing foreign countries to station soldiers on canadian soil, to protect thier assets?
Sightings of such soldiers have been reported in BC and northern alberta.
I call bull$hit.....loosen the strap on the tinfoil hat....
I call bull$hit.....loosen the strap on the tinfoil hat....
Bull**** or not, your choice to believe or not but leave the tinfoil **** out of it. You dont know me so dont call me names or insinuate things about me.I call bull$hit.....loosen the strap on the tinfoil hat....
Bull**** or not, your choice to believe or not but leave the tinfoil **** out of it. You dont know me so dont call me names or insinuate things about me.
Treat others how you wish to be treated, thats the start for all of humanity to start progressing VS going backwards like we have been.
So you dont know about the bill JT passed allowing foreign countries to station soldiers on canadian soil, to protect thier assets?
Sightings of such soldiers have been reported in BC and northern alberta.
What about CFB Suffield. That’s all British troops stationed in Canada. A bit different than Chinese troops here but nothing will surprise me anymore with this stupid prime minister. Welcome to ChinadaJustin did not pass the Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) it was signed in 2012 during Harpers tenure and came into effect in 2014. It does not allow for foreign troops to be stationed In Canada.
From Wikipedia:
The three core Canada China FIPA substantive obligations include "non-discriminatory treatment", "fair and equitable treatment",[SUP][6][/SUP] and "compensation for expropriation".[SUP][3][/SUP] According to a 2012 article, Canada's 2012 FIPPA model, links "fair and equitable treatment" to "The Minimum Standard of Treatment" customary international law. This ensures "fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security in accordance with the principles of customary international law."[SUP][7]
Article 15 provides that investors of one country are permitted to sue the government of the other county through an international tribunal.[10][/SUP][SUP]:23[/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP] Corporations from either country can sue if the country in which they have their operations has public policies even those intended on protecting the environment, health, or safety that the corporation says "interferes with the corporation’s profitability".
What about CFB Suffield. That’s all British troops stationed in Canada. A bit different than Chinese troops here but nothing will surprise me anymore with this stupid prime minister. Welcome to Chinada
I know when and who of the FIPA agreement. I highly doubt wikipedia has all the details about that agreement too .Justin did not pass the Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) it was signed in 2012 during Harpers tenure and came into effect in 2014. It does not allow for foreign troops to be stationed In Canada.
From Wikipedia:
The three core Canada China FIPA substantive obligations include "non-discriminatory treatment", "fair and equitable treatment",[SUP][6][/SUP] and "compensation for expropriation".[SUP][3][/SUP] According to a 2012 article, Canada's 2012 FIPPA model, links "fair and equitable treatment" to "The Minimum Standard of Treatment" customary international law. This ensures "fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security in accordance with the principles of customary international law."[SUP][7]
Article 15 provides that investors of one country are permitted to sue the government of the other county through an international tribunal.[SUP][URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada-China_Promotion_and_Reciprocal_Protection_of_Investments_Agreement#cite_note-van_Harten_2015-12"][10][/SUP][SUP]:23[/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP] Corporations from either country can sue if the country in which they have their operations has public policies even those intended on protecting the environment, health, or safety that the corporation says "interferes with the corporation’s profitability".
[/URL][/SUP]