Doo also holds 12lbs less gas than poo. Which makes poo even more impressive.
Haha I guess. Just dont sidehill..lolWhat's really impressive is how the heavy 154 expert will spank the 155, and 163 Poo. Just sayin.
Haha I guess. Just dont sidehill..lol
The etec is far superior as far as fuel mileage is concerned (not turbo version) With a 16” wide track, better power delivery and direct injection we spend a lot less time spinning our wheels and make more miles going up, down and across hills. With Polaris poor traction and narrow track you all look like Chris burandt on a bunny hill. Never seen a day where a pro went further than an etec. Turbo needs fuel though no denying that
The etec is far superior as far as fuel mileage is concerned (not turbo version) With a 16” wide track, better power delivery and direct injection we spend a lot less time spinning our wheels and make more miles going up, down and across hills. With Polaris poor traction and narrow track you all look like Chris burandt on a bunny hill. Never seen a day where a pro went further than an etec. Turbo needs fuel though no denying that
Thats hilarious, 850 etecs in our group burn by far the most fuel and have the most inefficient power delivery. Buddies on 850's barely get 3 mountain trips to a belt, I can do 3 seasons to a beltThe etec is far superior as far as fuel mileage is concerned (not turbo version) With a 16” wide track, better power delivery and direct injection we spend a lot less time spinning our wheels and make more miles going up, down and across hills. With Polaris poor traction and narrow track you all look like Chris burandt on a bunny hill. Never seen a day where a pro went further than an etec. Turbo needs fuel though no denying that