Rear Suspension issue...

Yaco

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
34
Reaction score
57
Location
BC
So brought home the new sled. Noticed the rear sags a lot and doesnt really rebound after compressing it down by hand. Also when I stand on it the rear basically feels bottomed out. Anyone else have this issue? Calling dealer tomorrow as they're closed today.
 

Yaco

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
34
Reaction score
57
Location
BC
Take it off the dollies.

Checked it off the dollies and how about that...you were right.

Now my question is....why does the Skidoo do that when put up on dollies? This is my first Skidoo, but I owned a Cat before and it never sagged like that. Also my buddies Pro RMK (which was sitting right beside my XM) doesn't sag at all when on the dollies. Is there a reason behind it?
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,790
Reaction score
20,864
Location
Salmon Arm
Not sure but my guess is that the float in the cat or coilover shock in the pro rebound better than the torsion springs in the doo. I would also wager that doing the scissor relocate would help.
 

catinthehat

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
2,458
Location
Cranbrook BC
Checked it off the dollies and how about that...you were right.

Now my question is....why does the Skidoo do that when put up on dollies? This is my first Skidoo, but I owned a Cat before and it never sagged like that. Also my buddies Pro RMK (which was sitting right beside my XM) doesn't sag at all when on the dollies. Is there a reason behind it?
My cat does the same thing only not quite that bad, it certainly changes depending where the dollie is under the track.
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,005
Location
Leduc Alberta
People think sag is always a bad thing. But they don't realize it helps the ride. With sag your suspension fall into hole instead of the hole sled
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,082
Reaction score
43,178
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
People think sag is always a bad thing. But they don't realize it helps the ride. With sag your suspension fall into hole instead of the hole sled

Thank you!!!!!!! This is why guys on the xm are floating down the trail without breaking a sweat and the other guys look like they are hating there lives


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
 

oler1234

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,653
Reaction score
6,207
Location
Calgary, AB & Golden, BC
I will x3 those comments. Unlike you cat... Skidoo has suspension. Some sag is good, excessive is bad. Look at baja trucks, how much sag do they have in there rides.... Same would apply to us running whooped up trails. Also helps to maintain control and fractions.
 

dabensmiller

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
453
Reaction score
865
Location
DV/Sicamous
Proper rebound is another key factor to keeping a smooth ride over rough trails. I have fought with this when setting up a new MX bike. I always laugh when guys jack there spring pressure to the max when they think their suspension is too soft.
 

Yaco

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
34
Reaction score
57
Location
BC
People think sag is always a bad thing. But they don't realize it helps the ride. With sag your suspension fall into hole instead of the hole sled

Read my posts dude. It wasn't "some" sag on the dollies....it was excessive. Off the dollies it's fine and sits normally, with normal bound/rebound. I just hadn't realized the dollies made that big of a difference on the Skidoo's as I had never seen a sled react like that just to being put up on dollies.
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,005
Location
Leduc Alberta
Read my posts dude. It wasn't "some" sag on the dollies....it was excessive. Off the dollies it's fine and sits normally, with normal bound/rebound. I just hadn't realized the dollies made that big of a difference on the Skidoo's as I had never seen a sled react like that just to being put up on dollies.

I know what you you said in your post and get what you where saying. I thought I would post what I did before we got countless guys posting about how much sag there xm had, and how they had to put the stiffest springs they could find and still sags. Sorry if I sounded like I was directing that towards you , I wasn't it was towards the other guys that would of posted about there sag.
 

Yaco

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
34
Reaction score
57
Location
BC
Aaahhhh ok. My bad. All good bro. :beer:
 

sledhead5000

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
460
Reaction score
269
Location
Calgary, Alberta
Website
www.pdotsledding.com
Had the same issue with my XM last season. Rear bumper would sag about 4" from fully extended, then my fat ass would just about bottom it out. Front and rear shock/springs were cranked right up. Talked to Bow Cycle South about it, they said it wasn't a problem. I do know that they did have some faulty shocks on the 2013's that were replaced though.

I'm thinking I might just be fatter than the frenchmen in Quebec that test-ride these things. Fully loaded with avy backpack and gear I gotta be over 260. Skidoo specs I saw a while back said the sleds were set up for a rider weight of 185 lbs... which means the frenchmen gotta be around 150lbs without gear on. Too skinny to be beer drinkers.
 

Clode

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
29,550
Reaction score
46,587
Location
BC
seeing as the average male weights 185 without gear, once married fat and geared up 250 seems about right. The oems need to revisit the spring rates !!!
 

Dmf

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Messages
371
Reaction score
398
Location
Grande Prairie
Had the same issue with my XM last season. Rear bumper would sag about 4" from fully extended, then my fat ass would just about bottom it out. Front and rear shock/springs were cranked right up. Talked to Bow Cycle South about it, they said it wasn't a problem. I do know that they did have some faulty shocks on the 2013's that were replaced though.

I'm thinking I might just be fatter than the frenchmen in Quebec that test-ride these things. Fully loaded with avy backpack and gear I gotta be over 260. Skidoo specs I saw a while back said the sleds were set up for a rider weight of 185 lbs... which means the frenchmen gotta be around 150lbs without gear on. Too skinny to be beer drinkers.

some people make the mistake of thinking the shock is what holds the sled up but it isn't, its the torsion springs. doesn't matter if the shock is good or not its not going to affect the "sag". im not saying that's what your saying, just a lot of people think that
 
Last edited:

sledhead5000

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
460
Reaction score
269
Location
Calgary, Alberta
Website
www.pdotsledding.com
some people make the mistake of thinking the shock is what holds the sled up but it isn't, its the torsion springs. doesn't matter if the shock is good or not its not going to affect the "sag". im not saying that's what your saying, just a lot of people think that

Yeah, it was a different issue with the shocks, I don't think it had anything to do with the sag.
I found a sag reducer kit for my old XP, haven't seen anything similar for a T-motion skid yet though.
 

Clay911

Active member
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
123
Reaction score
99
Just drill a hole 3/4" back on the rail to relocate your rear scissor.
 

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,374
Reaction score
14,292
Location
alberta
some people make the mistake of thinking the shock is what holds the sled up but it isn't, its the torsion springs. doesn't matter if the shock is good or not its not going to affect the "sag". im not saying that's what your saying, just a lot of people think that


What holds it up on a Cat or a Pro ?
 
Top Bottom