X-it
Active VIP Member
I will have to carry slingshot....I was rabbit hunting
Sling shot on a machine with no more than 100hp as well.
I will have to carry slingshot....I was rabbit hunting
Gotta be careful what you say nowadays. You might get impeached. lol
I wouldn't be too worried about me, but more about my insurance company going after whom ever. Especially if lost wages are incurred. Hope they can afford a really good lawyer LOL.
But hey now that you bring it up, it could be fun to show the dude a few tricks i learnt on my two tours in Bosnia. Now that could be fun for one of us. LOL
I have no problems hanging over sled paperwork when riding public land.
If I have broken or suspected of braking a law then I will identify.
To many peeps getting false COVID tickets because they let the cops id them for no reason
Sling shot on a machine with no more than 100hp as well.
This
Exactly my point. This thread was never intended to be about registration or insurance (I keep both on my iron btw) but more folks understanding their rights and not letting the rcmp abuse them by overstepping their boundaries and having you voluntarily comply to something your not required to protected by our CCRF’s. Freedom is to easily taken for granted and when it’s gone, it’s hard to get back. Look around the world
Operation of a motor vehicle or OHV is a privilege not a right. As such law enforcement can perform a stop any time, anywhere to check for license, insurance and registration if a vehicle is being or has been operated. You rights are not being violated, this law was ruled on in 1990 by the Supreme Court (see below). Fight the man all you want, you ain't gonna win.
Legislation passed in 1990 in the Supreme Court ruled that police may conduct a roadside stop if they are checking for either a driver’s licence, vehicle registration or proof of insurance. In addition, police have the right to pull you over for a random sobriety check, in which fitness of the driver is quickly gauged. Police may also reserve the right to pull you over if your vehicle is mechanically unfit to be on public roads. Things such as burnt out taillights and headlights are always grounds for a stop. Rule 5-4 of the Canadian Criminal Code states that driver rights are not violated in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in any of these scenarios. It is important to always remember that once you have been pulled over for any reason, you have the right to refuse questions from an officer, although many times cooperation will lead to reduced punishments or a warning.
https://fightthecharges.com/reasonable-grounds-police-stop-ontario/
Vehicle in the back of you truck or on a trailer, don't think so. as for "has been operated" so a warm sled in the back of your truck after you ride it on your property automatically becomes fair game to be checked for registration and insurance?
You should carry some form of ID at all times in case of emergency. If you had a wreck and someone finds you unconscious the have some info about you.
I knocked myself out riding my bike at a resort, patrol found me but I had no id. They had no idea who to contact until my wife called in looking for me.
I hope you found it and not lost like Bevs keys hiding safe spot.
LOL. Ha Ha.
Question: How Is it not illegal search or carding, if rcmp are going around asking folks in the parking lot for id, registration and insurance?
I thought the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms prevents unlawful searches (carding) unless suspected of a crime?
How is it any different than if they came up to you in Costco parking lot in Sherwood park and demanded the same ?
he operative word here is should, nothing says you SHALL
hey GENIUS, maybe go back and read your first line, lol, some peoples kids. u are not required to show id if police stop you, as long as you are walking around a parking lot sidewalk etc. and are not operating a motorized vehicle. your reading comprehension astounds me!Part 5 — Identification, Manufacturers' Stickers and LabelsIdentification required
25 (1)A person, other than a child under the age of 12 years, must not use or operate an off-road vehicle on Crown land or prescribed private land unless the person carries photo identification.
(2)
Photo identification under subsection (1) must state the birthdate of the person carrying it, and be issued by one of the following:
(a)the government;
(b)the government of Canada;
(c)the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia
(d)the government of a province or territory, or an agent of the government of a province or territory;
(e)a foreign jurisdiction.
(3)Photo identification issued by a foreign jurisdiction under subsection (2) (e) must be a valid passport or a driver's licence valid in the jurisdiction in which it is issued.
(4)A person required to carry photo identification under this section must produce it on request of an officer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain and simple. Cops can do it and request your identification.
Does not say "Should or Shall"
Maybe I am missing something that the Snow and Mud lawyers have hidden in their aersonal of rebuttals.....
LOL, Bwhaa Ha Ha,
Maybe this debate stuff is a little fun and entertaining.
If you require referances.. My co-counsel, Moyiesled might provide it....
Operative word is "Might",, not "Will."
Just kidding, I could reallt care less...... Do what your going to do everyone,
This thread goes sideways and off track every few posts....
Love it.....
Need that popcorn picture inserted...
Part 5 — Identification, Manufacturers' Stickers and LabelsIdentification required
25 (1)A person, other than a child under the age of 12 years, must not use or operate an off-road vehicle on Crown land or prescribed private land unless the person carries photo identification.
(2)
Photo identification under subsection (1) must state the birthdate of the person carrying it, and be issued by one of the following:
(a)the government;
(b)the government of Canada;
(c)the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia
(d)the government of a province or territory, or an agent of the government of a province or territory;
(e)a foreign jurisdiction.
(3)Photo identification issued by a foreign jurisdiction under subsection (2) (e) must be a valid passport or a driver's licence valid in the jurisdiction in which it is issued.
(4)A person required to carry photo identification under this section must produce it on request of an officer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain and simple. Cops can do it and request your identification.
Does not say "Should or Shall"
Maybe I am missing something that the Snow and Mud lawyers have hidden in their aersonal of rebuttals.....
LOL, Bwhaa Ha Ha,
Maybe this debate stuff is a little fun and entertaining.
If you require referances.. My co-counsel, Moyiesled might provide it....
Operative word is "Might",, not "Will."
Time after time there’s guys on here faced with having their machines stolen....and people complaining that the cops never catch the guys.....then you’re bitching because the cops are checking paperwork and VIN’s in random checks.....so riddle me this....how are the cops supposed to catch thieves and stolen equipment without looking for it?
You may know you’re a stand up guy, your stuff is yours....but nobody else does, and you look like just another guy with a sled and a truck, one of dozens that those cops see every week...so either quit complaining about random checks, or quit complaining about stuff being stolen....
hey GENIUS, maybe go back and read your first line, lol, some peoples kids. u are not required to show id if police stop you, as long as you are walking around a parking lot sidewalk etc. and are not operating a motorized vehicle. your reading comprehension astounds me!