Looks to me like the guy in the picture could be just inside the line. The park boundary is not clearly marked up there, and the "ridge" is a bit of a grey area as to how wide the actual "park boundary" right-of-way is along the ridge. We've always treated the ridge ("ridge" defined as the flat area on the top of the hill, but there is not a lot of "flat" terrain up there at times in winter) as the boundary and tried to stay as close to it as possible, but I'm not riding right along the top of the cornice either, so long as people are reasonable about riding as close to the ridge as safely practical, then IMO its fine. No, the excuse that the ridge overhang was not safe is not a license to carve half way down the slope into park terrain. If people can't stay close to the ridge then they shouldn't be up there.
In the park is still in the park though, and the gov't will ticket you regardless, might be worth removing the offending pic for optics, but I do understand what JCMX is saying about cabin valley in Quartz also, as I've made many comments to try and educate people doing this and recieved many middle fingers and many snide comments back as well.
This pic is from the bowl looking west at the ridge. Anything over the ridge is park IMO.
In the park is still in the park though, and the gov't will ticket you regardless, might be worth removing the offending pic for optics, but I do understand what JCMX is saying about cabin valley in Quartz also, as I've made many comments to try and educate people doing this and recieved many middle fingers and many snide comments back as well.
This pic is from the bowl looking west at the ridge. Anything over the ridge is park IMO.