Going to drop the writ of election on Sunday

snochuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
6,193
Reaction score
20,180
Location
Edmonton
PPC has 318 riding filled. They could win majority IF people voted it that way.

The PPC are the only party being consistent while the others pander to their voter base depending on which way the winds of the court of public opinion blows. They are the only party wanting to put Canada and Canadians first. They are the only party that will let Alberta flourish. They are the only party not buying into the climate change agenda. They are the only party wanting smaller government and less taxation.

The only reason a conservative voter would not vote for the PPC is because they are scared. The CPC can not be considered a “Conservative party”, they are politically transgender as they are more left leaning while claiming to be on the right side of the spectrum. The CPC has had every opportunity to politically oppose the left and all they have done is vary slightly what the left says with a smidge of conservative dialect.

The CPC is no different then a guy who friends with a woman abuser, never tells the guy he is scum, never helps out the woman when her man is beating her to death and when she finally leaves the abuser the guy standing around twiddling his thumbs tries to swoop in and get a piece of a$s, saying he never agreed with the abuser. But his actions never once showed he had the balls to stop his friend from beating the woman.


The only thing the PPC are going to do is split the vote and ensure a liberal majority win.

Do the PPC have a good platform - yup.
Do the PPC have the old school values - yup.
Are the PPC firm in their beliefs and actually confirm clearly their stance on issues - yup.
Are the PPC the best party - Probably!!!

They still don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of even getting to official opposition status this time.
Just a vote splitter party this time, that's it - next time would be a different story when they have history on what they really can do/have done.
Just to new to do any good this time.

Canada can not withstand another 4 years of the Turd - voting PPC just insures a majority for the TURD.
Is it wrong to vote for "the party" - typically yes it is wrong - but that ahole TURD needs to get flushed.

O'toole is running excellent adds - may be 50% BS, I don't know - just a campaign.
The Conservatives are not the same as the liberals, however anyone supporting the Liberals/NDP/Green will definatly promote this idea.
At least the Conservatives are willing to address the debt and have somewhat of a plan on fixing what the other socialist parties are willing to let ride and continue to make worse.
The future generations of Canada have no future if the limitless spending is allowed to continue - eventually you have to pay up!

Sorry to those that try to say the Conservatives and Liberals are the same, they are not.
 

RyanM

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
5,561
Location
Bonnyville
The point of voting is to vote for what you believe in. If a persons stance is firm in the belief vote splitting is their concern then so be it. That’s fine. If a persons stance is to vote based on the party who’s platform they agree with most, that’s also fine.

Moral of the storey no matter which way a person chooses to vote stop guilting people to vote the way you want to.
 

2kDoo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
2,520
Reaction score
4,728
Location
s
The point of voting is to vote for what you believe in. If a persons stance is firm in the belief vote splitting is their concern then so be it. That’s fine. If a persons stance is to vote based on the party who’s platform they agree with most, that’s also fine.

Moral of the storey no matter which way a person chooses to vote stop guilting people to vote the way you want to.
It's what the overlords want bro,
Division amongst the ranks.
 

Caper11

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
18,826
Location
Edson,Alberta
This is a federal election, not provincial. The reason why the liberals are in power at the moment, is because the east ALWAYS thinks the conservatives are for the west. Comments like, the conservatives have never done anything for the east.
Most people in the east have no exposure to oil and gas, they love the idea of the carbon tax. At least O’tool is doing it differently if he does it at all, if he get a majority.

If people in the west feel compelled to vote for the PPC because he has a really good platform for the west, because he does, I agree with it now, and than.
That being said, If the liberals get in again because of emotional voters that vote for the PPC, “than don’t blame me, blame the PPC”
 
Last edited:

snochuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
6,193
Reaction score
20,180
Location
Edmonton
This is a federal election, not provincial. The reason why the liberals are in power at the moment, is because the east ALWAYS thinks the conservatives are for the west. Comments like, the conservatives have never done anything for the east.
Most people in the east have no exposure to oil and gas, they love the idea of the carbon tax. At least O’tool is doing it differently if he does it at all if he get a majority.

If people in the west feel compelled to vote for the PPC because he has a really good platform for the west, because he does, I agree with it now, and than.
If the liberals get in again because of emotional voters that vote for the PPC, “than don’t blame me, blame the PPC”
I agree for sure.
The PPC will be a great party to support, just not this time.
 

ABMax24

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
4,885
Reaction score
14,176
Location
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
The point of voting is to vote for what you believe in. If a persons stance is firm in the belief vote splitting is their concern then so be it. That’s fine. If a persons stance is to vote based on the party who’s platform they agree with most, that’s also fine.

Moral of the storey no matter which way a person chooses to vote stop guilting people to vote the way you want to.

Politics is a team sport.

You ever been to a kids soccer game? You know where most of the the kids are playing the game and a couple are out in the distance picking dandelions?

Just saying its better to be playing the game than picking dandelions out in right field.
 

Crustyolddude

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
538
Reaction score
1,332
Location
Fort Saskatchewan

RyanM

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
5,561
Location
Bonnyville
IMG_3323.jpg
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
108,839
Reaction score
105,822
Location
Milo,Alberta
New Ipsos polling showing Conservatives polling within 1 pt now in Canada and are leading in Ontario. NDP is up as well. Watch for the Liberals to get desperate. They have still not talked about their election platform and will most likely change it on the fly to counter Conservative and NDP promises. I think he knows now he needs to steal votes from the NDP as he won't get them from the right. I honestly hope people wait until election day to make their firm decision on what right wing party they will vote for. A riding like Banff/Airdrie which is traditionally a powerhouse seat for the Conservatives could easily go NDP if the vote splits 4 ways.
 

Mike270412

Golden Boy
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
29,396
Reaction score
48,081
Location
GBCA

snochuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
6,193
Reaction score
20,180
Location
Edmonton
BC requires Vaccine passport to vote? What? https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021HLTH0053-001659

When I was a kid our church priest used to tell us how his family used to need papers to travel even short distances in Russia.
Well the Turd is doing an excellent job along with provincial govts of stripping any freedoms left.
 

Crustyolddude

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
538
Reaction score
1,332
Location
Fort Saskatchewan
New Ipsos polling showing Conservatives polling within 1 pt now in Canada and are leading in Ontario. NDP is up as well. Watch for the Liberals to get desperate. They have still not talked about their election platform and will most likely change it on the fly to counter Conservative and NDP promises. I think he knows now he needs to steal votes from the NDP as he won't get them from the right. I honestly hope people wait until election day to make their firm decision on what right wing party they will vote for. A riding like Banff/Airdrie which is traditionally a powerhouse seat for the Conservatives could easily go NDP if the vote splits 4 ways.
Desperate. You bet. Today liberals are all in on real estate for the under 40 crowd.

In case you missed it, here are the main points. Do not attempt to read this while drinking anything.

  • After gutting contributions for everybody’s TFSA, Trudeau wants to create a new one. But only for people under 40. And only to buy a house. They could stash $40,000 in there, grow it tax free and use the cash for a downpayment. Forty grand equals almost seven years of regular allowable TFSA contributions, by the way, but this amount could instantly be sheltered for a property. This is in addition to tax-free RRSP withdrawals ($70,000 per couple) to buy real estate. Now two newbies could suck $150,000 from registered funds with no tax payable. Over 40? Saving and investing for retirement? Well, suck it up. This is the Realtor® PM.
  • The federal government would also cover most closing costs by doubling the first-time homebuyers tax credit, from five grand to $10,000.
  • Mortgage borrowing would be made less expensive and leverage encouraged by slashing the cost of mandatory CMHC insurance for all high-ratio mortgages (less than 20% down). The premium would drop by 25%, saving more than $6,000 on average.
  • A multigenerational tax credit would be created to encourage families to buy and expand housing or to add a secondary unit.
  • Over $1 billion will be spent on a “rent-to-own” program which would “create a pathway” for tenants to become owners of a property within five years.
  • And the feds would hand over $4 billion to cities for a “pool of cash” to be used if they created “middle class housing.”
Can you think of additional ways to increase demand for scarce listings, rendering it more attractive and appealing for first-time buyers to compete for houses and further escalate prices? Nah, me neither.

There’s more. Lots more.

greater fool blog….
 

Caper11

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
18,826
Location
Edson,Alberta
Desperate. You bet. Today liberals are all in on real estate for the under 40 crowd.

In case you missed it, here are the main points. Do not attempt to read this while drinking anything.

  • After gutting contributions for everybody’s TFSA, Trudeau wants to create a new one. But only for people under 40. And only to buy a house. They could stash $40,000 in there, grow it tax free and use the cash for a downpayment. Forty grand equals almost seven years of regular allowable TFSA contributions, by the way, but this amount could instantly be sheltered for a property. This is in addition to tax-free RRSP withdrawals ($70,000 per couple) to buy real estate. Now two newbies could suck $150,000 from registered funds with no tax payable. Over 40? Saving and investing for retirement? Well, suck it up. This is the Realtor PM.
  • The federal government would also cover most closing costs by doubling the first-time homebuyers tax credit, from five grand to $10,000.
  • Mortgage borrowing would be made less expensive and leverage encouraged by slashing the cost of mandatory CMHC insurance for all high-ratio mortgages (less than 20% down). The premium would drop by 25%, saving more than $6,000 on average.
  • A multigenerational tax credit would be created to encourage families to buy and expand housing or to add a secondary unit.
  • Over $1 billion will be spent on a “rent-to-own” program which would “create a pathway” for tenants to become owners of a property within five years.
  • And the feds would hand over $4 billion to cities for a “pool of cash” to be used if they created “middle class housing.”
Can you think of additional ways to increase demand for scarce listings, rendering it more attractive and appealing for first-time buyers to compete for houses and further escalate prices? Nah, me neither.

There’s more. Lots more.

greater fool blog….

I hope people do not fall for this BS. If people do not have money for a down payment on a house, how are they going to have 40g in a TFSA account????
 

2kDoo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
2,520
Reaction score
4,728
Location
s
Desperate. You bet. Today liberals are all in on real estate for the under 40 crowd.

In case you missed it, here are the main points. Do not attempt to read this while drinking anything.

  • After gutting contributions for everybody’s TFSA, Trudeau wants to create a new one. But only for people under 40. And only to buy a house. They could stash $40,000 in there, grow it tax free and use the cash for a downpayment. Forty grand equals almost seven years of regular allowable TFSA contributions, by the way, but this amount could instantly be sheltered for a property. This is in addition to tax-free RRSP withdrawals ($70,000 per couple) to buy real estate. Now two newbies could suck $150,000 from registered funds with no tax payable. Over 40? Saving and investing for retirement? Well, suck it up. This is the Realtor® PM.
  • The federal government would also cover most closing costs by doubling the first-time homebuyers tax credit, from five grand to $10,000.
  • Mortgage borrowing would be made less expensive and leverage encouraged by slashing the cost of mandatory CMHC insurance for all high-ratio mortgages (less than 20% down). The premium would drop by 25%, saving more than $6,000 on average.
  • A multigenerational tax credit would be created to encourage families to buy and expand housing or to add a secondary unit.
  • Over $1 billion will be spent on a “rent-to-own” program which would “create a pathway” for tenants to become owners of a property within five years.
  • And the feds would hand over $4 billion to cities for a “pool of cash” to be used if they created “middle class housing.”
Can you think of additional ways to increase demand for scarce listings, rendering it more attractive and appealing for first-time buyers to compete for houses and further escalate prices? Nah, me neither.

There’s more. Lots more.

greater fool blog….
you forgot to mention the part where The .gov owns part of your title and will get ANY profit in the value if a person takes advantage of these BS incentives and sells their propery...it's all in the fine print
 

2kDoo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
2,520
Reaction score
4,728
Location
s
I hope people do not fall for this BS. If people do not have money for a down payment on a house, how are they going to have 40g in a TFSA account????
it dont matter. IF they take the 10k for a first time home owners the .gov gets that 10k back or X percent of the value it went up, whichever is higher...
Money doesnt even exist, it's not like a bank has 500k sitting around per person to loan out....it's all just a contract for slavery
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
19,411
Reaction score
68,996
Location
Local
it dont matter. IF they take the 10k for a first time home owners the .gov gets that 10k back or X percent of the value it went up, whichever is higher...
Money doesnt even exist, it's not like a bank has 500k sitting around per person to loan out....it's all just a contract for slavery
Its an easy contract to get out of. Just quit paying.
 
Top Bottom