gotboost
Active VIP Member
172 is ok but I wouldn't get one I would spend the money on a Cessna 180 way better plane for the buck
He's French, what do ( you) expectYa i know my spelling and grammar suck. i try.
a 172 only is a 2 passenger float plane at best and only a 1 person in the mountains. Underpowered.172 is a very popular float plane. maybe your thinking 152. in that case i dont think it would get off the water lol
a 172 only is a 2 passenger float plane at best and only a 1 person in the mountains. Underpowered.
a 172 only is a 2 passenger float plane at best and only a 1 person in the mountains. Underpowered.
He's French, what do ( you) expect
An Bien, Je parles en francais aussi! Une ce peu.
Wanted this for 15 years? Curious how old you are? The older we become the harder it is to start a career in aviation.
I've flown 172's lots, I agree with those who say its underpowered as a floatplane. A 180 or 185 is better but much more money and I see that's where the $300/hr came from.
Looking at the course (link you provided) there is no mention of a commercial pilot's license. If you want to fly for hire you'll need your commercial pilots license. First a private pilots license followed by a commercial license. Plus night endorsement, instrument rating, etc.
The Beaver..Now that's a real workhorse of a plane! Man, I've packed tubs and tubs and tubs of fish and supplies out of many northern Ontario Native settlements in Beavers in the past. Never felt safer in any other plane. Pour mois, le francais est just pour le fun. Je suis Ukranian Canadian Mais je ve l'ecole secondaire a Hearst Ont. Beaucous les fillies just parles en francais so......