That would be a sweet truck!
What comes with the Harley Package?
We tried both the Eco boost IMO was not really impressive. On paper it puts down nice numbers but it didn't do anything for me when the pedal hits the floor so to speak. We went with the 5.0 in the wife's truck and really impressed mileage is within .5 lper 100 km of the ecoboost and seems to have more real world power. Put 20 000 lm on it do far and really happy. We had each unit for a week prior to purchase.Sounds like a few small issues reading that forum.. From what I here the 6.2 is a pig.
Anyone tried the 5?
We tried both the Eco boost IMO was not really impressive. On paper it puts down nice numbers but it didn't do anything for me when the pedal hits the floor so to speak. We went with the 5.0 in the wife's truck and really impressed mileage is within .5 lper 100 km of the ecoboost and seems to have more real world power. Put 20 000 lm on it do far and really happy. We had each unit for a week prior to purchase.
Also heard a rumor at the dealer the other day that they are only giving the turbos a 100 k life expectancy. Could be a big pill to swallow shortly after the warranty goes out
good for your hemi. I dont recall saying hemis are bad and never buy one, if it wasent for that coil rear suspension i might b drivin one. I believe this forum was started because someone was wondering 6.2 or ecoboost,peeps that have one give there numbers and experiences for peoples can use that as info for themselves but like any other forums when someone is asking for help theres always the diehards to there brands that sit on the internet all day and look for the negative on some thing and then blab it to their friends. Before u know it everyone hates it. Its the same as sleds, quads, sidexsides. As for anyone buying a ecoboost cuz the factory numbers say 29mpg the better read the fine print cuz thats on a 2 wheel drive pickup at sea level
just sayin