Diamond drive??

Little

Active member
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Messages
54
Reaction score
15
Location
SK
Tried the search, didn't help.

Why did A/C do away with the Diamond drive system??
Seems simple enuf, but get a different answer from dealer, mech. and die hard A/C guys.
What's your opinion??
 

moyiesledhead

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5,473
Reaction score
10,951
Location
Moyie B.C.
They've tied the secondary to a fixed distance from the primary and allowed the secondary to float in the chassis when the engine moves. Keeps center to center distance on the clutches always the same. Couldn't do that with a Diamond drive. I think the jury's still out on whether it's an improvement or not. Personally...I liked the Diamond drive.
 

krash

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
224
Reaction score
55
Location
FSJ BC
I don't really know the answer to that, but one thing I know fore sure, it's night and day difference swaping a track on DD drive takes me about half an hour, swaped my buddys track the other night on 2012 procclimb took 2 of us 2.5 hours... it was painfull LOL
 

Modman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
6,040
Reaction score
8,523
Location
Castlegar
Tried the search, didn't help.

Why did A/C do away with the Diamond drive system??
Seems simple enuf, but get a different answer from dealer, mech. and die hard A/C guys.
What's your opinion??

Cat found that they were losing a small amount of power through the diamond drive, not significant but it was more than was being lost in the chaincase and gear set up.
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
20,097
Reaction score
43,303
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Cat found that they were losing a small amount of power through the diamond drive, not significant but it was more than was being lost in the chaincase and gear set up.

I remember the literature when it was first released I thought they said it was ten percent more efficient or something like that.
 

Modman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
6,040
Reaction score
8,523
Location
Castlegar
I remember the literature when it was first released I thought they said it was ten percent more efficient or something like that.
Not sure what the % was, but maybe that was the "no-oil prototype" that was more efficient... :) That was directly from a reputable source who may or may not represent AC, makes sense considering it is now gone.
 

IGBT

Active member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
43
Reaction score
11
Location
Washington
chains can be more efficient than gears but I would guess that a chain system with the same reduction as the diamond drive would be quite larger/heavier?
 

tmo1620

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
4,056
Reaction score
8,086
Location
Whitecourt
I told a guy this last year in Valemount while drinking a couple beers in the hot tub, he thought I was retarded, he said get a grip kid, you think arctic cat would run with a drive system that robbed power for all those years........? I asked him if he had driven the new proclimb, of course he said no, told him to drive an 11 m8 and a 12m8 and he could see for himself that there is a noticeable difference in power to the ground. And when we gave him the option to do so the next day when we seen him up on clemina he said no

Cat found that they were losing a small amount of power through the diamond drive, not significant but it was more than was being lost in the chaincase and gear set up.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom