eattheweak
Active member
Well I used the link and gave my two cents. Everyone should it is to easy to blog and do nothing, please be heard.
What did I say;
I support expansion of both areas
I don't support closure of any area that it will bring over population to one and it's closure because of the enviro impact.
User fees, and restrict the use of Bruderheim to two wheeled vehicles, quads under 90cc and horseback. Also zone this are for the above.
Redwater to be unrestricted in motorized vehicles.
Basically my thoughts are reduce impact in the area they want to close out rite. So not to cause over use of another (I used Mclean Creek as an example where in the southern area is two wheels only to some degree and marking areas/trails for use).
Yes it is not a 100% solution, and some will not like my point of view. Thing is I gave my point of view. YOUR TURN! I use both areas (might ave seen me out there my whole family rides my boy rides the DR-Z 70 with the training wheels :d that how most reconzed us, do be scared to say hi.
What did I say;
I support expansion of both areas
I don't support closure of any area that it will bring over population to one and it's closure because of the enviro impact.
User fees, and restrict the use of Bruderheim to two wheeled vehicles, quads under 90cc and horseback. Also zone this are for the above.
Redwater to be unrestricted in motorized vehicles.
Basically my thoughts are reduce impact in the area they want to close out rite. So not to cause over use of another (I used Mclean Creek as an example where in the southern area is two wheels only to some degree and marking areas/trails for use).
Yes it is not a 100% solution, and some will not like my point of view. Thing is I gave my point of view. YOUR TURN! I use both areas (might ave seen me out there my whole family rides my boy rides the DR-Z 70 with the training wheels :d that how most reconzed us, do be scared to say hi.