Has anyone with a belt eater checked their clutch alignment?
So I'm not to sure if this helps anyone or if it could be some of the issue.
I recently got back from a 3-day trip and put on 160 ish km.
No problems other than normal belt dust on white plastic......
I removed the hood and did a bit of a inspection. Every thing looks good so I plug off the intake and soap down the under hood and clutches and pressure washer them out.
Now on my XM's the water would always drain out from under the clutches within a couple minutes.
But on the G4 it just stays there. No water dripping out.nothing.
Anyone else noticed this?
Or am I stretching for something that isn't really a issue?
I will add that I have a skid plate on.
Sent from my SM-N920W8 using Tapatalk
I also did this.I have always drilled a 1/4" hole in the depression under the primary. Mostly, for drainage when I clean up the clutch bay at the end of the season. Maybe before that time would be good to get rid of the water.
Cut a hole. Remove some foam. Never blow a belt again. Mmmmmmkay.
Just thinking out loud here but it would be cool to hear the laughter from the old school clutching legends when they hear that belt issue remedy.
wow now I don't feel that bad with all the issues that I had with my dragon. Thanks guys. sorry if I poached the thread.
You know I would have thought that we would see reports from techs that work at SkiDoo dealerships on blown engines if it was happening? Not one as of the other day and I went back 4 weeks on the BRP Community site? I would like to see some proof as well? Not saying it couldn't be true but one or two engines is not recall material. There is always a 1-2% failure rate on proven engines in the past and this is a new engine?
There are 2 options for the 174 models this year. 21-49 gearing for sea level to 4000 ft and 19-49 gearing for over 4000 ft. I don't see any reason to run the 21-49 for the elevation and type of riding that sled is intended for IMO Mach 1.So snopro, what's this I hear the 174 was released with 2 gear ratio, is that crap if not what are they, I heard the low one is garbage, thx
There are 2 options for the 174 models this year. 21-49 gearing for sea level to 4000 ft and 19-49 gearing for over 4000 ft. I don't see any reason to run the 21-49 for the elevation and type of riding that sled is intended for IMO Mach 1.
You know I would have thought that we would see reports from techs that work at SkiDoo dealerships on blown engines if it was happening? Not one as of the other day and I went back 4 weeks on the BRP Community site? I would like to see some proof as well? Not saying it couldn't be true but one or two engines is not recall material. There is always a 1-2% failure rate on proven engines in the past and this is a new engine?