BC, what have you done???? NDP is gonna take you down, big time

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,373
Reaction score
14,292
Location
alberta
While the energy sector is important ,if they ruin the housing market ..
That will be the nail in the coffin ...
That is huge , particularly in "Greater Vancouver Area and Retirement Interior locations"

fixed it for you. Majority of BC , the housing industry depends on resource/energy industries. Like Alberta, just not as large a factor.
 

rzrgade

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
7,580
Reaction score
14,760
Location
West of Toronto
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170731/085d22ce29213215dcd2a3498de84b5c.jpg[/IMG
This is interesting, and puts things in perspective...
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,799
Reaction score
17,793
Location
Prince George
Maybe those fast cat ferries are still kicking around, they never worked as ferries ...maybe they can be turned into power producers.
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,769
Reaction score
20,785
Location
Salmon Arm
While the energy sector is important ,if they ruin the housing market ..
That will be the nail in the coffin ...
That is huge , particularly in "Greater Vancouver Area and Retirement Interior locations"

fixed it for you. Majority of BC , the housing industry depends on resource/energy industries. Like Alberta, just not as large a factor.
Actually the majority of BC lives in GVR and retirement/vacation locations. Very small population of the province is actually rural and resource dependent and those that are have floundering real estate markets already. The Liberals were actively trying to tank the RE market and the NDGreen will take it up a notch. Market is already in free fall in Toronto and Vancouver has been de-stabilizing for months.
 

S.W.A.T.

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
4,493
Reaction score
7,844
Location
Smithers
Maybe those fast cat ferries are still kicking around, they never worked as ferries ...maybe they can be turned into power producers.

Was that not a NDP blunder?

There was a article written just prior to the election about how 90% of the population lives south of hope and how 90% of the wealth generated in the province is North of hope. Pretty much taxation without representation IMO
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,799
Reaction score
17,793
Location
Prince George
It was the only thing the NDP ever did that was productive. Rules and red tape is their specialty. That forest practices code was a real dandy.
 

S.W.A.T.

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
4,493
Reaction score
7,844
Location
Smithers
It was the only thing the NDP ever did that was productive. Rules and red tape is their specialty. That forest practices code was a real dandy.

Forest practice code is a plunder but does have some good points. Not disposing oil in the local creek seams legit
 

LennyR

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
3,373
Reaction score
14,292
Location
alberta
Actually the majority of BC lives in GVR and retirement/vacation locations. Very small population of the province is actually rural and resource dependent and those that are have floundering real estate markets already. The Liberals were actively trying to tank the RE market and the NDGreen will take it up a notch. Market is already in free fall in Toronto and Vancouver has been de-stabilizing for months.

Hard to have much confidence in the attempt to adjust or manipulate the markets in places like GV or Toronto, they are very unique markets with traits not always related to the present economic conditions. But in so many cities and towns the home has still been the greatest equity building investment a lot of family's depend on. And when the resource world goes sour, and the wages or worse , the jobs shrink up, it can spell disaster for a lot of people's future . Not so much the speculators , a lot of those losses will have been calculated in the risk assessments at the time of purchase.
 

Mayfly

Active member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
122
Reaction score
163
Location
Calahoo,AB
By Gwyn Morgan

President Donald Trump has said Canada’s energy exports are unfair to the U.S. He is clearly oblivious that we’ve given Americans the biggest trade gift ever to flow from one country to another because of our own, self-inflicted inability to access offshore markets with Canadian oil.

After almost a decade and more than $1 billion spent on planning and regulatory filings, five major oil-export pipelines remain unbuilt, leaving us with no choice but to sell our oil to U.S. buyers at below world prices. Depending on the world price and other factors, the resulting captive-market discount has been as much as US$10 per barrel on the 3.8-million barrels per day exported to the U.S. That amounts to a US$38-million daily gift to Americans, who then export their own oil at the full international market price.

But how can one criticize Trump for his lack of awareness of this expensive giveaway when our federal government, along with the governments of every province except Alberta and Saskatchewan, have no comprehension of these facts?

Meanwhile, interminable regulatory delays have stymied more than $100 billion of proposed LNG export projects aimed at Asian markets, and discounted Canadian natural gas finds it way to newly constructed LNG export facilities in Louisiana and Texas to be exported at the full international price.

And it gets worse. While the Trump administration streamlines regulatory approvals for the construction of American oil pipelines and LNG export facilities, Canada has done the opposite. This has led Canadian oil and gas producers, including my former company Encana, to move tens of billons of investment dollars and many jobs south of the border. And Enbridge’s recent $37-billion acquisition of Houston-based Spectra Energy demonstrates that Canadian pipeline companies are also looking to the U.S. for regulatory-friendly growth.

Canada has become one of the world’s most successful democracies because of our sound, constitutionally based laws governing political, legal and regulatory matters. The National Energy Board, which administers petroleum industry laws and regulations, is internationally respected for its technical expertise, unbiased fairness and professionalism.

During the three decades my team and I spent building EnCana into what became the largest Canadian-based energy company, we invested tens of billons of dollars, creating tens of thousands of high-quality jobs for employees, contractors and suppliers across the country. We paid billions of dollars in government royalties and income tax. Our success helped thousands of shareholders build their futures.

This is but one company’s human and economic impact. There are scores of others, large and small who made the oil and gas industry a Canadian economic cornerstone. None of this could have happened without confidence in our country’s laws and regulations, and the governments responsible for enforcing them.

If EnCana wished to build a pipeline or a processing plant, we worked with affected communities to minimize negative impacts and paid fair compensation where appropriate. We applied to regulatory authorities who gave our project careful technical and environmental examination. The hearing process included consideration of the views of those directly impacted and was conducted with an awareness of the economic cost of unnecessary delay.

As I prepared to retire in 2006, the term “social licence” began to enter the regulatory lexicon. It eventually came to mean that almost any person or group could claim a voice about a project with a legitimacy equal to that of the people directly impacted by the project. And it marked the beginning of the end of timely, cost-aware regulatory processes. As the social-licence snowball gained momentum, it accumulated anti-fossil-fuel zealots, multi-national environmental groups, Aboriginal bands claiming control over huge tracts of “traditional lands,” and scores of others opposing projects for whatever reason.

The result has transformed regulatory proceedings that would have previously taken weeks into multi-year events with skyrocketing costs that either delay or kill the project.

Enbridge’s Northern Gateway oil-export pipeline is a lamentable example. The original application was filed in 2010. After four years and half a billion dollars of expenditures, the project gained conditional federal approval from the Harper government in 2014. This was followed a year later by the Trudeau government’s moratorium on oil tankers on B.C.’s northern coast which, if fully implemented, would stymie the project. Then in November 2016, Prime Minister Trudeau announced a reversal of the federal government’s approval, stating that “the Great Bear Rainforest is no place for an oil pipeline,” even though that “Great Bear Rainforest” designation didn’t even exist during the regulatory process.

Besides this political betrayal of Canada’s regulatory laws, the oil industry’s hopes for international market access have seen TransCanada’s Keystone XL project rejected by President Obama, also for purely political reasons. And its proposed Energy East Pipeline faces opposition from municipal and provincial governments, plus aboriginal groups in Ontario and Quebec, while both provinces continue to hold their hands out for equalization grants funded by the oil revenues they oppose.

That leaves Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain project, which miraculously made it through the whole social-licence gauntlet to gain full approval in late 2016. Yet, the recent B.C. election has delivered an NDP/Green party coalition vowing to use “every tool in the toolbox” to stop Trans Mountain.

The constitution of Canada gives the federal government the unequivocal right to approve the project, but it will require unwavering determination on the part of Trudeau and his cabinet to enforce that right. This is the final chance to end the ruinous giveaway of billions of dollars to the Americans while giving the beleaguered oil industry and its millions of employees their first glimmer of hope. And if this project fails, why would anyone invest in our oil and gas industry again?

Whether they like the project or not, Canadians had better hope that Kinder Morgan is able to complete its pipeline. Any other outcome would be a failure of our democracy to enforce the constitutional rule of law that we all depend upon for our fundamental freedoms and justice.

Gwyn Morgan is the retired founding CEO of EnCana Corp. He has been a director of five global corporations.


 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,799
Reaction score
17,793
Location
Prince George
Well it takes two of these jerks to run BC, if one does not dance with the other this coup is over. So basically you have the green party calling the shots. Then throw the natives into that pot. But bottom line you can blame Alison Redford for this entire mess, this should have been built then. We will be chirping the same tune if site c dam does not go in.....now!! Only with power. Oh and by the way Alison Redford is now a consensus builder and still screwing over your pipelines. Here are her words.


Indeed, Redford praised Notley’s climate change strategy for Alberta, unveiled Sunday and involving a cap on emissions for the oil sands and a $3-billion economy-wide carbon tax.
 
Last edited:

pano-dude

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
15,673
Location
invermere
I think I'm going to get out of the patch and get a job in tourism. Once the socialists are done our dollar will tank and we can be the northern Mexico.

I hope you like minimum wage....
 
Top Bottom